首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering >Origin of the reservoir quality difference between Chang 8 and Chang 9 Member sandstones in the Honghe Oil Field of the Southern Ordos Basin, China
【24h】

Origin of the reservoir quality difference between Chang 8 and Chang 9 Member sandstones in the Honghe Oil Field of the Southern Ordos Basin, China

机译:康沃州南部鄂尔多斯盆地红河油田昌8和Chang 9成员砂岩的储层质量差异的起源

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Understanding the reservoir quality and heterogeneity of tight oil sandstone reservoirs is essential for their exploration and production. An integration of lithological, diagenetic and hydrocarbon emplacement factors was analyzed to understand the reservoir quality difference in Chang 8 and Chang 9 sandstones of Yanchang Formation, Honghe Oil Field, Ordos Basin, using core, well logs, casting thin sections, SEM, cathode luminescence images and x-ray diffraction data. The results show that Chang 8 and Chang 9 sandstones are mainly fine to medium-grained feldspathic litharenites and lithic arkose with moderately well to well sorting, from braided-delta front subaqueous distributary channel facies. The average porosity and permeability of Chang 8 and Chang 9 sandstones are 8.52%, 0.27mD and 12.96%, 2.86mD, respectively. The main diagenesis types are mechanical compaction, authigenic chlorite, calcite cement, and dissolution. The Chang 8 and Chang 9 sandstone reservoir quality difference is mainly a result of the oil charging and diagenetic environment change. The Chang 8 sandstones that close to the source rock have a high content of feldspar and lithic dissolution and grain collapse from the acidic fluids injection, which dramatically decrease porosity and permeability. Whereas, the Chang 9 sandstones far from the NW-SE direction faults have a small amount of oil charging and acidic fluid injection, which result in high content of chlorite that narrow the throats and reduce permeability, but slightly reduce porosity. Only the sandstones at the bottom of Chang 8 or close to the NW-SE direction faults in Chang 9 Member have a small amount of acidic dissolution, medium content of chlorite, which lead to the relatively high porosity and permeability. High calcite cement contents are mainly observed at the top or bottom of the sandbody, which is not the main factor that leads to the Chang 8 and Chang 9 sandstone reservoir quality difference.
机译:了解紧身油砂岩水库的水库质量和异质性对于他们的勘探和生产至关重要。分析了岩性,成岩和碳氢化合物的施加因子的整合,了解延昌地区昌8和常长9砂岩的储层质量差异,利用核心,井原木,铸造薄片,SEM,阴极发光图像和X射线衍射数据。结果表明,张8和常温砂岩主要针对中粒细胞型石英石和岩石树脂,以良好的良好分类,从编织Δ前水分分布沟道相。常8和常9砂岩的平均孔隙率和渗透率分别为8.52%,0.27md和12.96%,2.86md。主要成岩作用类型是机械压实,Aherigenic亚氯酸盐,方解石水泥和溶解。张8和张9砂岩储层质量差异主要是油充电和成岩环境变化的结果。靠近源岩的昌8个砂岩具有高含量的长石和岩石溶解,酸性流体注射的晶粒塌陷,这显着降低了孔隙率和渗透性。虽然,Chanc 9砂岩远离NW-SE方向故障具有少量的油充电和酸性流体注入,导致高含量的亚氯酸盐,缩小喉咙并降低渗透性,但略微降低孔隙率。只有Chang 8底部的砂岩或靠近CHAN 9成员的NW-SE方向故障的含量少量酸性溶解,亚氯酸盐中含量,这导致孔隙率相对高,渗透性。在砂体的顶部或底部主要观察到高方解石水泥含量,这不是导致Chang 8和Chang 9砂岩储层质量差异的主要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号