首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering >Estimation of density and compressibility factor of natural gas using artificial intelligence approach
【24h】

Estimation of density and compressibility factor of natural gas using artificial intelligence approach

机译:人工智能方法估算天然气的密度和可压缩因子

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Natural gas density is commonly measured by Coriolis density meters and gas chromatographs, both of which are used to calculate the natural gas mass flow rate. In this study, two networks are proposed to predict the density and compressibility factor of natural gas. The first network (N-1) uses temperature, pressure and Joule Thomson (JT) coefficient of natural gas as input variables and density of natural gas is selected to be the target. This network is proposed to predict the natural gas density at natural gas pressure drop stations (CGSs). For this network, the gas mixture compositions are unnecessary. The second network (N-2) is proposed based on the pseudo reduced temperature and pressure as input variables that the network by using these two variables can predict the density and compressibility factor of natural gas. This model needs the gas mixture compositions. For these targets, a novel idea based on artificial intelligence is used. Five models of artificial intelligence are implemented that are fuzzy inference system (FIS), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), ANFIS optimized with genetic algorithm (ANFIS-GA), multilayer feed-forward neural network (MLFFNN) and group method of data handling (GMDH). The results demonstrated that the ANFIS-GA and GMDH model performed better than the FIS, MLFFNN and ANFIS models. For N-1, root mean square error (RMSE) for ANFIS-GA and GMDH models were obtained as 0.2405 and 0.2042 (kg/m(3)), respectively. For N-2 (compressibility factor), the value of RMSE for ANFIS-GA and GMDH models consecutively was achieved 0.0061 and 0.0054. Also, for N-2 (density), RMSE for ANFIS-GA and GMDH models was taken 2.2735 and 2.6113, respectively. These values of RMSE were reported for the testing phase of the models.
机译:天然气密度通常通过科里奥利密度计和气相色谱仪测量,两者都用于计算天然气质量流量。在本研究中,提出了两个网络以预测天然气的密度和可压缩因子。第一网络(N-1)使用温度,压力和焦耳汤姆逊(JT)天然气系数作为输入变量和天然气的密度被选为目标。提出该网络以预测天然气压降站(CGSS)的天然气体密度。对于该网络,不需要气体混合物组合物。基于伪降低的温度和压力提出了第二网络(N-2)作为通过使用这两个变量的输入变量,可以预测天然气的密度和可压缩因子。该模型需要气体混合物组合物。对于这些目标,使用了一种基于人工智能的新颖思想。实施了五种人工智能模型,是模糊推理系统(FIS),适应性神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS),ANFIS用遗传算法(ANFIS-GA),多层前馈神经网络(MLFFNN)和组方法进行了优化数据处理(GMDH)。结果表明,ANFIS-GA和GMDH模型比FIS,MLFFNN和ANFIS模型更好。对于N-1,获得ANFIS-GA和GMDH模型的根均方误差(RMSE)分别为0.2405和0.2042(kg / m(3))。对于N-2(可压缩因子),实现了ANFIS-GA和GMDH模型的RMSE的值,实现了0.0061和0.0054。此外,对于N-2(密度),SCIS-GA和GMDH模型的RMSE分别为2.2735和2.6113。报告了模型的测试阶段报告了RMSE的这些值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号