首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public health >Quality of implementation of the school health program in a rural district of Oyo State, Nigeria: a public-private comparison
【24h】

Quality of implementation of the school health program in a rural district of Oyo State, Nigeria: a public-private comparison

机译:尼日利亚农田乡村农村地区学校卫生计划的质量:公私比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background There is abundant evidence that the first and only School Health Policy (SHPo) in Nigeria was adopted in 2006, but no study has since evaluated the quality of implementation (Qol) in government and privately funded schools. This study was conducted to evaluate the Qol of the School Health Program (SHP) in public and private primary schools of a rural Local Government Area in Oyo State using the SHPo framework as a guide. Subjects and methods A comparative-descriptive cross-sectional design was chosen. A two-stage sampling technique was used to select 46 primary schools in a rural area: 30 public and 16 private. An observational checklist was used to assess the five domains of the SHP, namely: School Health Services (SHS), Skills Based Health Education (SBHE), School Feeding Services (SFS), Healthful School Environment (HSE) and School, Home and Community Relationship (SHCR), as listed in the Nigerian SHPo framework. Qol was assessed by exploring the availability, suitability and functionality of basic provisions for SHP implementation. Results The majority of schools (90% public; 87.5% private) had first-aid boxes, but they had no contents in 23.3% of public and 68.8% of private schools. In only one private school was evidence of periodic medical inspection. A school meal service was present in 93.3% of public and 18.8% of private schools. Only one private school practiced medical screening. Some had gender-sensitive toilets (81.3% private; 33.3% public). None of the schools had evidence of pre-employment medical and routine screening for non-communicable diseases for staff. Overall, around 50% of schools had poor Qol of the SHP (63.3% public; 25.0% private). Conclusion Qol of the SHP in selected rural public and private primary schools was generally poor, but with better quality in private than public schools.
机译:背景技术有丰富的证据表明,尼日利亚的第一个和唯一的学校卫生政策(SHPO)于2006年通过,但自从评估政府和私人资助的学校的实施质量(QOL)以来。通过SHPO框架作为指导,进行了本研究,以评估牡蛎州农村地方政府地区公共和私人小学的QoL中学卫生计划(SHP)的QoL。主题和方法选择了比较描述性横截面设计。两级采样技术用于在农村地区选择46所小学:30公共和16名私人。用于评估SHP的五个领域,即:学校卫生服务(SHS),基于技能的健康教育(SBHE),学校喂养服务(SFS),健康的学校环境(HSE)和学校,家庭和社区的五个域名关系(SHCR),如尼日利亚SHPO框架所列。通过探索SHP实施的基本规定的可用性,适用性和功能来评估QOL。结果大多数学校(90%公众; 87.5%的私人)有急救箱,但他们在公众的23.3%和68.8%的私立学校没有内容。只有一所私立学校是定期医学检查的证据。一家学校膳食服务占93.3%的公共和18.8%的私立学校。只有一所私立学校练习医疗筛查。有些人有性别敏感的厕所(私人81.3%;公众33.3%)。没有学校都有证据表明员工的非传染性疾病的职业前医学和常规筛查。总体而言,大约50%的学校的SHP QoL贫困(公众63.3%; 25.0%私有)。结论所选农村公共和私人小学的SHP QOL一般差,但私有质量比公立学校更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号