首页> 外文期刊>American journal of bioethics >Subjectivity, Consciousness, and Pain: The Importance of Thinking Phenomenologically
【24h】

Subjectivity, Consciousness, and Pain: The Importance of Thinking Phenomenologically

机译:主体性,意识和痛苦:现象学思维的重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Brain is a sine qua non for mind, but mind is not reducible to brain. In slightly different terms, the premise that con-sciousness does not float in the ether fails to license the conclusion that consciousness is equivalent to and nothing but brain. Searle maintains that this argument is "ludicrously simple" and "quite decisive" (Searle 1992), and yet there is excellent evidence that the claim is widely rejected in both neuroscience and neuroethics. As Amanda Pustilnik (2008) notes, many contemporary neuroscientists profess neuroreductionism or the idea that mind is nothing but neurophysiological substrate. It is in part because I believe such reductionism is mistaken that Gillett's (2009) latest contribution to neuroethics is so important.
机译:大脑是头脑的必要条件,但头脑无法还原为大脑。用稍微不同的术语来说,意识不在以太中漂浮的前提不能证明意识是等同于大脑的。塞尔认为,这一论点是“荒谬的简单”和“相当决定性的”(Searle 1992),然而,有充分的证据表明,这一主张在神经科学和神经伦理学中都被广泛拒绝。正如Amanda Pustilnik(2008)所指出的那样,许多当代神经科学家宣称神经还原论或认为头脑不过是神经生理学的底物的想法。部分原因是因为我认为这种还原论是错误的,因此吉列(2009)对神经伦理学的最新贡献是如此重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号