首页> 外文期刊>American journal of dentistry >Flexural resistance of Cerec CAD/CAM system ceramic blocks. Part 2: Outsourcing materials
【24h】

Flexural resistance of Cerec CAD/CAM system ceramic blocks. Part 2: Outsourcing materials

机译:Cerec CAD / CAM系统陶瓷块的抗弯强度。第2部分:外包材料

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To test different Cerec CAD/CAM system ceramic blocks, comparing mean flexural strength (σ), Weibull modulus (m), and Weibull characteristic strength (σ0) in an ISO standardized set-up. Methods: Following the recent ISO Standard (ISO 6872:2008), 11 types of ceramic blocks were tested: IPS e.max CAD MO, IPS e.max CAD LT and IPS e.max CAD HT (lithium disilicate glass-ceramic); In-Ceram SPINELL, In-Ceram Alumina and In-Ceram Zirconia (glass-infiltrated materials); inCoris AL and In-Ceram AL (densely sintered alumina); In-Ceram YZ, IPS e.max Zir-CAD and inCoris ZI (densely sintered zirconia). Specimens were cut out from ceramic blocks, finished, crystallized/infiltrated/sintered, polished, and tested in a three-point bending test apparatus. Flexural strength, Weibull characteristic strength, and Weibull modulus were obtained. Results: A statistically significant difference was found (P 0.001) among lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (σ = 272.6±376.8 MPa, m = 6.2±11.3, σ0 = 294.0±394.1 MPa) and densely sintered alumina (σ = 441.8±541.6 MPa, m = 11.9±19.0, σ0 = 454.2±565.2 MPa). No statistically significant difference was found (P= 0.254) in glass infiltrated materials (σ = 376.9±405.5 MPa, m = 7.5±11.5, σ0 = 393.7±427.0 MPa). No statistically significant difference was found (P= 0.160) in densely sintered zirconia (σ = 1,060.8±1,227.8 MPa, m = 5.8±7.4, σ0 = 1,002.4±1,171.0 MPa). Not all the materials tested fulfilled the requirements for the clinical indications recommended by the manufacturer.
机译:目的:为了测试不同的Cerec CAD / CAM系统陶瓷块,在ISO标准化设置中比较平均弯曲强度(σ),威布尔模量(m)和威布尔特征强度(σ0)。方法:按照最新的ISO标准(ISO 6872:2008),测试了11种类型的陶瓷块:IPS e.max CAD MO,IPS e.max CAD LT和IPS e.max CAD HT(二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷);陶瓷内SPINELL,陶瓷内氧化铝和陶瓷内氧化锆(玻璃渗透材料); inCoris AL和In-Ceram AL(致密烧结氧化铝);陶瓷内YZ,IPS e.max Zir-CAD和inCoris ZI(致密烧结氧化锆)。从陶瓷块上切下样品,进行精加工,结晶/渗入/烧结,抛光,并在三点弯曲测试设备中进行测试。获得抗弯强度,威布尔特征强度和威布尔模量。结果:发现二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷(σ= 272.6±376.8 MPa,m = 6.2±11.3,σ0= 294.0±394.1 MPa)和致密烧结氧化铝(σ= 441.8±541.6)之间存在统计学差异(P <0.001) MPa,m = 11.9±19.0MPa,σ0= 454.2±565.2MPa)。在玻璃渗透材料中(σ= 376.9±405.5 MPa,m = 7.5±11.5,σ0= 393.7±427.0 MPa),未发现统计学差异(P = 0.254)。在致密烧结的氧化锆中(σ= 1,060.8±1,227.8 MPa,m = 5.8±7.4,σ0= 1,002.4±1,171.0 MPa),未发现统计学上的显着差异(P = 0.160)。并非所有测试的材料都满足制造商推荐的临床适应症要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号