...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of prosthodontics: official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists >Microtensile Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin Blocks to Dual-Cure Adhesive Cement: The Effect of Different Sandblasting Procedures
【24h】

Microtensile Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin Blocks to Dual-Cure Adhesive Cement: The Effect of Different Sandblasting Procedures

机译:CAD / CAM树脂树脂的微调粘合强度与双固加固粘合剂水泥:不同喷砂手术的效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose To investigate the effect of sandblasting powder particles on microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) of dual-cure adhesive cement to CAD/CAM blocks. Materials and Methods CAD/CAM blocks (Cerasmart, VITA, and LAVA) were cut in slabs and divided into groups: group 1, no sandblasting; group 2, sandblasted with 27-mu m Al2O3; group 3, sandblasted with 30-mu m CoJet; group 4, sandblasted with 50-mu m Al2O3. After sandblasting, all specimens were silanized and luted using dual-cure adhesive cement (G-CEM LinkForce). After 24 hours, bonded specimens were cut into 1 +/- 0.2 mm(2) sticks, and mu TBS values were obtained (N = 30). Additionally, 132 CAD/CAM block sections were prepared for surface roughness testing and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluations. Results were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis One-way ANOVA and Dunn's Post Hoc Test (p 0.05). Results Group 1 exhibited significantly lower mu TBS than the other groups (p 0.05). The highest bond strength values were obtained from group 4 (p 0.05). For LAVA, mu TBS values of specimens that were sandblasted with 50-mu m Al2O3 powder were significantly higher than 30-mu m-SiO2 and 27-mu m Al2O3 (p 0.05). Conclusions The sand particles investigated (27-mu m Al2O3, 30-mu m SiO2, or 50-mu m Al2O3) did not significantly affect mu TBS results of CAD/CAM blocks for Cerasmart and VITA, although the results changed significantly for LAVA. The ideal bond protocol for CAD/CAM blocks is specific to the material used.
机译:目的探讨喷砂粉末颗粒对CAD / CAM块双固加强粘合剂水泥的微调制粘合强度(MU TBS)的影响。材料和方法CAD / CAM块(CERASMART,VITA和LAVA)在板坯中切割并分为组:第1组,没有喷砂;第2组,用27-mu m al2O3喷砂;第3组,用30-mu m cojet的喷砂;第4组,用50-mu m al2O3喷砂。喷砂后,所有标本都是硅烷化并使用双固加固粘合剂水泥(G-CEM LINKFORCE)粘附。 24小时后,将键合标本切成1 +/- 0.2mm(2)杆,获得MU TBS值(n = 30)。另外,为表面粗糙度测试和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估制备了132个CAD /凸轮块部分。使用Kruskal-Wallis单向ANOVA和DUNN的后HOC测试分析了结果(P <0.05)。结果第1组比其他组显着低于其他群体(P <0.05)。最高键强值从第4组(P&GT; 0.05)获得。对于熔岩,用50-mu m al2O3粉末喷砂的样品的Mu Tbs值显着高于30-mu m-siO 2和27-mu m al 2 O 3(p <0.05)。结论所研究的砂颗粒(27-mu m Al2O3,30-mu m siO 2或50-mu m Al2O3)没有显着影响CERASMART和VITA的CAD / CAM块的MU TBS结果,尽管熔岩可显着变化。 CAD / CAM块的理想粘接方案特定于所用的材料。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号