首页> 外文期刊>American journal of bioethics >Incorporating Balanced Accountability in a Clinical Ethics Fellowship Program
【24h】

Incorporating Balanced Accountability in a Clinical Ethics Fellowship Program

机译:将均衡的问责制纳入临床道德研究金计划

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As the emerging profession of clinical ethics continues to reflect on important questions such as attestation, certification, and accreditation (Magill 2013),Weise and Daly (2014) provide the opportunity to consider the degree to which clinical ethics consultants should accept accountability for the advice rendered in an ethics consult. This topic has broad application throughout the discipline toward continuing to promote practice standards (Reel 2012) such as the American Society for Bioethics & Humanities Core Competencies for Healthcare Ethics Consultation (American Society for Bioethics & Humanities Core Competencies Update Task Force 2011). In addition, this discourse is also relevant for those who direct energies toward training future clinical ethics consultants. Specifically, I aim to look at how the teaching of balanced accountability might be integrated in a clinical ethics fellowship program.
机译:随着新兴的临床伦理学专业继续思考重要问题,例如认证,认证和认证(Magill,2013年),Weise和Daly(2014年)提供了机会,以考虑临床伦理学顾问应接受建议的问责程度进行道德咨询。该主题在整个学科中得到广泛应用,以继续推广实践标准(Reel 2012),例如美国生物伦理与人文科学保健伦理道德核心咨询委员会(美国生物伦理与人文科学核心竞争力更新任务组2011)。此外,本篇文章还与那些直接致力于培训未来临床伦理顾问的人有关。具体来说,我的目的是研究如何将平衡问责制的教学整合到临床伦理研究金计划中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号