...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Political Economy >Do incentives matter? managerial contracts for dual-purpose funds
【24h】

Do incentives matter? managerial contracts for dual-purpose funds

机译:做奖励物质吗? 双目性资金管理合同

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We examine the contracts used to compensate the managers of the seven dual-purpose investment companies that existed between 1967 and 1985 to determine whether financial incentives influence real behavior in the predicted way. The compensation contracts for these funds provided explicit incentives for the production of both capital gains and current income. We model the behavior that an expected compensation-maximizing agent would exhibit when faced with such contracts and derive several testable implications. Our empirical results are consistent with the theoretical predictions, and so we are able to use this relatively clean setting to contribute to the growing literature concerned with determining the impact of incentive contracts on behavior. A unique and interesting aspect of this study is that the nature of these organizations allows us to provide evidence that the market understood and priced the behavior induced by these contracts.
机译:我们审查用于弥补1967年至1985年间存在的七家二用途投资公司的管理人员,以确定金融激励是否以预测的方式影响真实行为。 这些资金的赔偿合同为生产资本收益和当前收入提供了明确的激励。 我们模拟了预期补偿最大化代理在面临此类合同时展示的行为,并导出几种可测试的含义。 我们的经验结果与理论预测一致,因此我们能够使用这种相对清洁的环境来促进越来越多的文学,与确定激励合同对行为的影响。 本研究的独特且有趣的方面是,这些组织的性质使我们能够提供市场所理解和定价这些合同所引起的行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号