...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of personality and social psychology >It Helps to Ask: The Cumulative Benefits of Asking Follow-Up Questions
【24h】

It Helps to Ask: The Cumulative Benefits of Asking Follow-Up Questions

机译:它有助于问:提出后续问题的累积效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In a recent article published in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JPSP; Huang, Yeomans, Brooks, Minson, & Gino, 2017), we reported the results of 2 experiments involving "getting acquainted" conversations among strangers and an observational field study of heterosexual speed daters. In all 3 studies, we found that asking more questions in conversation, especially follow-up questions (that indicate responsiveness to a partner), increases interpersonal liking of the question asker. Kluger and Malloy (2019) offer a critique of the analyses in Study 3 of our article. Though their response is a positive signal of engaged interest in our research, they made 3 core mistakes in their analyses that render their critique invalid. First, they tested the wrong variables, leading to conclusions that were erroneous. Second, even if they had analyzed the correct variables, some of their analytical choices were not valid for our speed-dating dataset, casting doubt on their conclusions. Third, they misrepresented our original findings, ignoring results in all 3 of our studies that disprove some of their central criticisms. In summary, the conclusions that Kluger and Malloy (2019) drew about Huang et al. (2017)'s findings are incorrect. The original results are reliable and robust: Asking more questions, especially follow-up questions, increases interpersonal liking.
机译:在最近发表的人格和社会心理学杂志(JPSP; Huang,Yeomans,Brooks,Minson,&Gino),2017年,我们报告了2个实验的结果,涉及陌生人之间的“熟悉”对话和观察实地研究异性速度速度。在所有3项研究中,我们发现在谈话中询问更多问题,特别是跟进问题(表明对合作伙伴的响应),增加了人际关系的问题。 Kluger和Malloy(2019)为我们的文章3的研究3分析提供了批评。虽然他们的回应是我们研究的参与兴趣的积极信号,但他们在分析中取得了3个核心错误,使其批评无效。首先,他们测试了错误的变量,导致结论是错误的。其次,即使他们分析了正确的变量,他们的一些分析选择对于我们的速度约会数据集无效,对他们的结论进行了疑虑。第三,他们歪曲了我们的原始调查结果,在我们所有三项研究中忽略了结果,这使得他们的一些中央批评。总之,Kluger和Malloy(2019)涉及Huang等人的结论。 (2017)的调查结果不正确。原始结果是可靠和强大的:询问更多问题,尤其是后续问题,增加人际关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号