首页> 外文期刊>Journal of physical activity & health >What is the State of the Science on Physical Activity Interventions for Family Caregivers? A Systematic Review and RE-AIM Evaluation
【24h】

What is the State of the Science on Physical Activity Interventions for Family Caregivers? A Systematic Review and RE-AIM Evaluation

机译:家庭护理人员身体活动干预措施的科学状态是什么? 系统审查和重新瞄准评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Family caregivers are an important health care resource and represent a significant proportion of Canadian and US populations. Family caregivers suffer physical and psychological health problems because of being in the caregiver role. Interventions to support caregiver health, including physical activity (PA), are slow to be investigated and translated into practice. Purpose: To examine the evidence for PA interventions in caregivers and determine factors hampering the uptake of this evidence into practice. Methods: A systematic review and evaluation of internal and external validity using the RE-AIM (Reach, Efficacy/Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework was conducted. Randomized controlled trials or pretest/posttest studies of PA interventions were included. Results: Fourteen studies were published between 1997 and 2015. Methodological quality of studies and risk of bias was variable. External validity criteria were often not reported. Mean reporting levels were 1) reach, 53%; 2) efficacy/effectiveness, 73%; 3) adoption, 18%; 4) implementation, 48%; and 5) maintenance, 2%. Conclusions: The lack of reporting of components of internal and external validity hinders the integration of caregiver PA interventions into clinical or community settings. Researchers should focus on standardized outcomes, accepted reporting criteria, and balancing factors of internal and external validity, to advance the state of the science.
机译:背景:家庭护理人员是一个重要的医疗保健资源,代表加拿大和美国人口的大量比例。家庭照顾者因在照顾者的角色而遭受身心健康问题。支持护理人员健康的干预措施,包括身体活动(PA),才能调查和翻译成实践。目的:检查护理人员的PA干预的证据,并确定阻碍了这种证据的影响的因素。方法:采用重新瞄准(达到,效力/有效性,采用,实施和维护)框架进行系统审查和评估内部和外部有效性。包括随机对照试验或PA干预的预测试/后测试研究。结果:1997年至2015年间发布了十四项研究。方法论研究质量和偏倚风险是可变的。往往没有报告外部有效性标准。平均报告水平为1)达到,53%; 2)疗效/效率,73%; 3)采用,18%; 4)实施,48%; 5)维护,2%。结论:缺乏内部和外部有效性成分的报告阻碍了护理人员PA干预融入临床或社区环境的整合。研究人员应专注于标准化结果,接受报告标准和内部有效性的平衡因素,以推进科学状态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号