...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica >Predictors of cardiac responsiveness to fluid therapy after cardiac surgery.
【24h】

Predictors of cardiac responsiveness to fluid therapy after cardiac surgery.

机译:心脏手术后心脏对液体疗法的反应性预测指标。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Central venous pressure (CVP) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) are insensitive preload markers and sometimes misleading. The introduction of the pulse contour method for monitoring of continuous cardiac output enabled the real-time quantification of stroke volume variation (SVV). Studies evaluating the accuracy of this parameter as a measure of preload responsiveness are still limited and conflicting results have been published in cardiac surgical patients. The aim of this study was to reevaluate the predictive value of SVV regarding cardiac responsiveness to fluid therapy and to compare it with the standard preload variables in a clinical setting in the ICU after cardiac surgery. METHODS: The assessment of cardiac responsiveness to fluid therapy (HAES-steril 6% 10 mL * Body Mass Index) was performed in 92 ventilated coronary artery surgical patients after arrival in the ICU. After the fluid load, detailed hemodynamic measurements were performed. A 'responder' was defined as a patient with a gain in stroke volume index (SVI) of 5% or more from baseline value to the volume challenge. RESULTS: Post hoc analysis showed that there were 47 responders to the fluid challenge and 45 non-responders. Hemodynamic data before the fluid therapy show that stroke volume variation in the responders group was significantly higher than in the non-responders groups (9.7 +/- 4.3% versus 7.6 +/- 3.0%, P = 0.01). The receiver operating characteristic curves for the baseline values of CVP, PCWP and SVV were constructed for illustrative purposes. The area under the curve for baseline values of SVV was significantly higher than random guess (area = 0.65, p < 0.05), indicative for the value of SVV as a marker of cardiac responsiveness to fluid therapy. The static preload parameters CVP and PCWP had no predictive value. CONCLUSION: SVV as measured with the LiDCO system is a better functional marker of cardiac responsiveness to fluid therapy than the static parameters CVP and PCWP.
机译:目的:中心静脉压(CVP)和肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)是不敏感的预负荷指标,有时会引起误解。用于监视连续心输出量的脉冲轮廓法的引入实现了对搏动量变化(SVV)的实时量化。评估此参数作为预负荷反应性度量的准确性的研究仍然有限,并且在心脏外科手术患者中发表了矛盾的结果。这项研究的目的是重新评估SVV对心脏对液体疗法的反应性的预测价值,并将其与心脏手术后ICU的临床环境中的标准预负荷变量进行比较。方法:对92名接受ICU通气的冠状动脉外科手术患者进行了对液体治疗的心脏反应性评估(HAES-无菌6%10 mL *体重指数)。输液后,进行详细的血液动力学测量。 “响应者”被定义为从基线值到体积挑战的中风体积指数(SVI)增高5%或更多的患者。结果:事后分析表明,有47名反应者对体液挑战和45名无反应者。输液治疗前的血流动力学数据显示,反应者组的卒中量变化显着高于非反应者组(9.7 +/- 4.3%对7.6 +/- 3.0%,P = 0.01)。出于说明目的,构建了CVP,PCWP和SVV基线值的接收器工作特性曲线。 SVV基线值的曲线下面积显着高于随机猜测(面积= 0.65,p <0.05),这表明SVV可以作为心脏对液体疗法反应的标志。静态预载参数CVP和PCWP没有预测价值。结论:与静态参数CVP和PCWP相比,用LiDCO系统测量的SVV是心脏对液体治疗反应更好的功能标记。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号