...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition >Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Dioxide Versus Air Insufflation for Colonoscopy in Deeply Sedated Pediatric Patients
【24h】

Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Dioxide Versus Air Insufflation for Colonoscopy in Deeply Sedated Pediatric Patients

机译:二氧化碳与空气吹入的疗效和安全性在深层镇静儿科患者中的结肠镜检查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives:Studies have shown the advantages of carbon dioxide (CO2) over air insufflation in the adult population during colonoscopies. This study was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of CO2 insufflation in deeply sedated children undergoing colonoscopy.Methods:This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. We recruited 100 consecutive pediatric patients who had colonoscopy under deep sedation for various indications. Patients were first randomized by history of abdominal pain and then randomly assigned to either CO2 or air insufflation. Postprocedural abdominal pain scores were registered on a 10-point visual analog rating scale and significant pain was defined as a score of 3 or higher. Abdominal circumferences and end tidal CO2 (ETCO2) levels were measured. Complications during and after the procedure were recorded.Results:We did not find statistically significant difference between CO2 and air insufflation on univariate analysis because of low number of children experiencing significant pain after colonoscopy. After adjusting for baseline pain, we found that pain was significantly lower in patients after CO2 versus air insufflation on multivariable analysis (P=0.03). The significant factors related to pain were duration of the procedure (P=0.006), history of abdominal pain (P=0.002) and previous abdominal surgery (P=0.02). CO2 insufflation was associated with decreased abdominal circumference after colonoscopy (P=0.002). Girls were more likely to have pain regardless of intervention (P=.04).Conclusions:Most children tolerate endoscopic procedures without significant pain. Our study was underpowered to show significant difference between air and CO2 on univariate analysis. CO2 insufflation during colonoscopy, however, may reduce postprocedural abdominal pain. Significant factors for increased pain on multivariate analysis included colonoscopy length over 30minutes, history of abdominal pain, and previous abdominal surgery.
机译:目的:研究表明二氧化碳(CO2)在结肠镜检查期间成年人群中的空气吹气的优点。本研究旨在探讨CoSonoscopy的深层镇静儿童中CO2吹蛋的疗效和安全性。方法:这是一项前瞻性,随机的双盲临床试验。我们招募了100名在深层镇静的结肠镜检查的连续儿科患者进行各种适应症。患者首次被腹痛的历史随机化,然后随机分配给二氧化碳或空气吹气。后期腹部疼痛评分在10分视觉模拟评级规模上注册,并且显着的疼痛定义为3或更高的分数。测量腹部圆周和末端潮汐二氧化碳(ETCO2)水平。记录过程中的并发症。结果:由于结肠镜检查的儿童有显着疼痛,我们没有发现二氧化碳和空气吹气之间的统计学上有显着差异。在调整基线疼痛后,我们发现在CO 2对多变量分析上的空气吹气后疼痛显着降低(P = 0.03)。与疼痛有关的重要因素是程序的持续时间(p = 0.006),腹痛病史(p = 0.002)和以前的腹部手术(p = 0.02)。结肠镜检查后,CO2吹蛋与腹周下降有关(p = 0.002)。无论干预如何,女孩都更容易疼痛(p = .04).Conclusions:大多数儿童耐受内窥镜手术,没有显着疼痛。我们的研究在单变量分析中有可能表现出空气和二氧化碳之间的显着差异。然而,结肠镜检查期间的二氧化碳吹蛋可能会降低后腹部疼痛。多元分析疼痛增加的重要因素包括超过30分钟,腹痛病史以及以前的腹部手术的结肠镜检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号