首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurology >A systematic review of cerebral hemodynamic responses to neural activation following stroke.
【24h】

A systematic review of cerebral hemodynamic responses to neural activation following stroke.

机译:脑卒中后神经活化的脑血流动力学反应的系统综述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to systematically review CBF studies, assess their methodological quality, and identify trends in the association between task-related brain activation patterns and CBF changes in ischemic stroke (IS) patients. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Sciences databases for studies of functional recovery with quantification of CBF responses to brain activation paradigms after IS. Titles, abstracts and full text of articles were scrutinised according to pre-defined selection criteria. Two independent reviewers (AS, VH) undertook the methodological quality screening and data extraction of the included studies. Sixteen of the 1,521 identified studies were relevant. Studies showed weaknesses in key methodological criteria (e.g. population size, discussion of limitations), and only seven studies compared responses with a control population. Overall, there was no agreement between CBF responses in either the affected or unaffected hemisphere and prediction of post-IS recovery. Some studies have shown a higher CBF increase in the unaffected hemisphere when the affected hemisphere was stimulated compared to the healthy control responses. However, CBF responses in the affected hemisphere were inconsistent. Many post-IS CBF studies are of poor methodological quality, and do not demonstrate a consistent response post-IS or a relationship with recovery. Further longitudinal studies assessing the natural history of CBF responses to brain paradigms following IS should be undertaken to determine prognostic significance, and to inform future therapeutic strategies.
机译:本研究的目的是系统地审查CBF研究,评估其方法论质量,并确定任务相关的脑激活模式和缺血性卒中中CBF变化之间关联的趋势。我们搜索了Medline,Embase,Cinahl和Sciences数据库,用于研究功能恢复,以便在脑激活范例中定量CBF响应。根据预定义的选择标准仔细审查文章的标题,摘要和完整文本。两个独立审稿人(如,VH)承诺了所包含的研究的方法质量筛选和数据提取。 1,521项研究的十六个相关的研究是相关的。研究表明关键方法论标准中的缺点(例如,人口规模,限制讨论),只有七项研究比较了对照人群的反应。总体而言,CBF在受影响或未受影响的半球的CBF反应之间没有达成协议,并且恢复后的预测。当刺激受影响的半球而被刺激与健康对照反应相比,一些研究表明了不受影响的半球增加的CBF增加。然而,受影响的半球中的CBF反应不一致。许多后的CBF研究具有较差的方法质量,并且不会证明持续的响应或与恢复的关系。应进行评估CBF反应对脑范围的自然病史的进一步纵向研究,以确定预后意义,并告知未来的治疗策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号