...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurology >Lost or unavailable? Exploring mechanisms that affect retrograde memory in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease patients
【24h】

Lost or unavailable? Exploring mechanisms that affect retrograde memory in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease patients

机译:丢失或不可用? 探索影响轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病患者逆行记忆的机制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Retrograde amnesia has been largely documented in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (a-MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, it is still not clear whether ineffectiveness in recalling past acquired information reflects loss of individual memory traces or failure to access specific stored traces. We aimed to disentangle the differential contribution of storage and retrieval processes to the pattern of retrograde amnesia in these patients. This issue was investigated in 18 a-MCI and 19 AD patients who were compared to 20 healthy controls. A novel questionnaire about public events was used; it consisted of two procedures (i.e., a free recall test and a true/false recognition test). Crucial differences emerged in the way the two groups of patients performed the experimental tasks. In fact, although both a-MCI and AD patients showed a similar pattern of impairment on the free recall test, a-MCI patients were able to normalise their performance on the recognition test, thus overcoming their deficits at the time of recall. Conversely, AD patients showed both reduced free recall ability and diminished sensitivity to benefit from recognition in recalling public events. Our findings suggest that the memory processes underlying RA were different for a-MCI and AD. Deficits in remote memory are prevalently explained by impaired retrieval abilities in a-MCI and by impaired storage in AD. This distinction between retrograde amnesia due to defective trace utilisation in a-MCI and trace storage in AD is consistent with the temporal unfolding of declining anterograde memory over the course of disease progression to AD.
机译:逆行静脉曲面已经在患有Amnestic认知障碍(A-MCI)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)的患者中进行了良好的记录。但是,仍然尚不清楚召回过去收购信息的无效反映了各个内存迹线的损失或无法访问特定的存储迹线。我们的旨在解散储存和检索过程对这些患者逆行的逆行模式的差异贡献。在18名A-MCI和19名AD患者中调查了这个问题,他们与20名健康对照组进行比较。一些关于公共活动的新型问卷;它包括两个程序(即免费召回测试和真/假识别测试)。两组患者进行了实验任务的方式出现了至关重要的差异。事实上,虽然A-MCI和AD患者在免费召回试验中显示出类似的损伤模式,但A-MCI患者能够将其性能正常化在识别测试中,从而克服了召回时的缺陷。相反,AD患者表现出免减速的召回能力和敏感度减少,从召回公共活动中受益。我们的研究结果表明,底层RA的内存流程对于A-MCI和AD不同。通过A-MCI中的检索能力受损和广告中的存储受损,引进远程存储器中的缺陷。由于A-MCI中的痕量痕量利用和广告中的痕量储存而导致的逆行静脉曲面之间的区别与在疾病进展到广告的疾病进展过程中逐渐下降的时间展开。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号