...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of oncology pharmacy practice: official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners >Moxifloxacin versus levofloxacin for antibacterial prophylaxis in acute leukemia patients
【24h】

Moxifloxacin versus levofloxacin for antibacterial prophylaxis in acute leukemia patients

机译:Moxifloxacin对急性白血病患者的抗菌预防左氧氟沙星

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective The primary endpoint of this study was to determine the incidence of febrile neutropenia among patients receiving either moxifloxacin or levofloxacin for antibacterial prophylaxis. Secondary endpoints were number of documented infections and in-hospital mortality in patients who develop febrile neutropenia. Methods A single-center retrospective cohort analysis at a large tertiary care academic medical center was conducted. This study included adult acute leukemia patients (age ≥18 years old) who received inpatient antibacterial prophylaxis (moxifloxacin or levofloxacin) from 1 July 2012 to 1 October 2014. Patients were excluded from the study if they were treated with antimicrobial therapy in the preceding five days or admitted to the hospital with neutropenic fever. Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical data and Mann–Whitney test for continuous data. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine risk factors for febrile neutropenia. Results Eighty-five patients were included in the final analysis with 40 patients who received moxifloxacin and 45 patients who received levofloxacin. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Twenty-two patients experienced febrile neutropenia requiring intravenous antibiotics in the moxifloxacin group and 30 patients in the levofloxacin group (P?=?0.190). Age and duration of neutropenia appeared to predict for febrile neutropenia; however, after multivariate analysis, longer duration of neutropenia was shown to be the best predictor for febrile neutropenia with an odds ratio of 4.69 (95% CI, 1.697–12.968). Both groups had similar rates of documented infections and in-hospital morality. Conclusion Moxifloxacin and levofloxacin showed similar rates of febrile neutropenia when used for neutropenic antibacterial prophylaxis in acute leukemia patients.
机译:目的本研究的主要终点是确定接受莫西沙星或左氧氟沙星的患者发热中性粒细胞率为抗菌预防的发病率。次要终点是开发出发热中性粒细胞率的患者的记录的感染和住院死亡率。方法进行大型高级护理学术医疗中心的单中心回顾性队列分析。本研究包括成人急性白血病患者(≥18岁),他们从2012年7月1日至10月1日期到2014年10月1日至10月1日期间接受了住院性抗菌预防(Moxifloxacin或左氧氟沙星)。如果在前五个中的抗微生物治疗治疗,患者被排除在研究之外天或录取医院,中性发烧。 Fisher的确切测试用于连续数据的分类数据和Mann-Whitney测试。逻辑回归分析用于确定发热中性粒细胞病的风险因素。结果八十五名患者含有40名患者,其中40名接受莫西沙星和45名接受左氧氟沙星的患者。两组之间的基线特征类似。二十二名患者经历了含有静脉氧基氧氟沙星组中静脉抗生素的发热中性粒细胞病,左氧氟沙星组30例(P?= 0.190)。中性粒细胞病变的年龄和持续时间似乎预测了发热中性粒细胞病;然而,在多变量分析之后,表现出较长的中性粒细胞病变的持续时间是发热中性蛋白的最佳预测因子,其具有4.69(95%CI,1.697-12.968)。两组均有类似的记录感染和住院道德的速率。结论艾灸氧氟辛和左氧氟沙星显示出在急性白血病患者中性抗菌预防时出现的发热中性粒细胞率均速率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号