首页> 外文期刊>Journal of opioid management >Staff time requirements for postoperative pain management: Comparison of sufentanil sublingual tablet system and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia
【24h】

Staff time requirements for postoperative pain management: Comparison of sufentanil sublingual tablet system and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia

机译:术后疼痛管理的员工时间要求:苏芬太尼舌下片系统和静脉患者控制镇痛的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Assessment and allocation of required staff time for postoperative pain management for two different patient-controlled technologies, sufentanil sublingual tablet system (SSTS) and intravenous analgesia (PCiA). Design: Activity-based evaluation. Setting: The study was conducted at four German hospitals based on the availability of the two technologies studied and their respective bed capacity broadly reflecting the German hospital landscape. Patients and participants: Staff activities were recorded for 162 SSTS and 154 PCiA procedures. Every hospital recorded around 40 procedures for each technology between December 2016 and fuly 2017. Interventions: Staff time was recorded if a patient received one of the two considered postoperative pain management technologies and was under treatment of a trained nurse. No further criteria were defined. Documentation of resource utilization covered all staff activities concerning the two technologies by detailed activity recording forms. Main outcome measure(s): Staff time for five identified process areas (preparation of therapy option, provisioning at patients' bed, therapy, removal of therapy option, reprocessing, and storage) with significant impact on the entire process. Results: The average staff time required for SSTS to manage the entire process was 36 minutes whereas for PCiA it was 49 minutes (p< 0.0001). In all process areas, SSTS showed significantly less staff time requirements. Conclusions: In comparison to PCiA, SSTS requires significantly less staff time to manage postoperative pain in the studied setting.
机译:目的:两种不同患者控制技术,苏芬太尼舌下片系统(SSTS)和静脉注射镇痛(PCIA)的评估和分配术后休息时间。设计:基于活动的评估。环境:该研究在四个德国医院进行了基于所研究的两种技术的可用性及其各自的床容量,广泛地反映了德国医院景观。患者和参与者:员工活动记录162 SST和154个PCIA程序。每位医院都在2016年12月和2017年12月之间为每项技术进行了录得左右的40个程序。干预措施:如果患者收到两种术后疼痛管理技术中的一个,并且正在治疗训练有素的护士,则记录员工时间。没有定义其他标准。资源利用文件通过详细的活动录制表格涵盖了有关两种技术的员工活动。主要结果措施:五个鉴定的过程区域的员工时间(疗法选择,患者床,治疗,治疗选项,再处理和储存的供应)对整个过程的显着影响。结果:SSTS管理整个过程所需的平均员工时间为36分钟,而PCIA则为49分钟(P <0.0001)。在所有流程区域,SST都显示出明显更少的员工时间要求。结论:与PCIA相比,SSTS需要较低的员工时间来管理学习环境中的术后疼痛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号