首页> 外文期刊>Journal of nonverbal behavior >Nonverbal Markers of Lying During Children's Collective Interviewing with Friends
【24h】

Nonverbal Markers of Lying During Children's Collective Interviewing with Friends

机译:在儿童集体采访中撒谎的非言语标记

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To examine nonverbal behaviors that may differentiate between lie- and truth-tellers, recent studies have relied on collective interviews (e.g., Vrij and Granhag in Appl Cognit Psychol 28(6):936-944, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3071), where participants were solicited to fake their responses about an unexperienced event. In this study, we made participants experience actual events that involved a potential rule violation, and later interviewed them collectively and unanticipatedly about these previously experienced events. Ninety same-sex preschool dyads were observed in a temptation resistance paradigm, where an adult experimenter proscribed touching of attractive toys and left the children alone. The dyads of children were later interviewed by the experimenter about how they handled this rule. Nonverbal behaviors were coded during the entire interview phase where they could lie by withholding transgression (i.e., lying by omission) and right after a target question where children chose to lie or tell the truth (i.e., lying by commission). Truth-tellers and lie-tellers showed (1) differences in response latency, looking at friend, and use of gestures right after the target question, but were (2) similar in their interactive nonverbal behaviors during the entire interview (i.e., speech transition, looking at friend, and utterance rate). This is the first study showing that nonverbal behaviors accompanying lie-telling behavior are different when a collective interview is carried out in a spontaneous deceptive context as opposed to planned deceptive contexts.
机译:为了审查可能区分谎言和真实性柜员的非言语行为,最近的研究依赖于集体访谈(例如,VRIJ和Appl Cognit Specionol 28(6):936-944,2014。https://doi.org /10.1002/ACP.3071),参与者被征求,以伪造他们对未经验的事件的回应。在这项研究中,我们使参与者体验了涉及潜在规则违规的实际事件,后来在这些以前经历过的事件中共同和意识到他们。在诱惑抵抗范式中观察到九十同类学龄前二元,其中成年实验者禁止感动有吸引力的玩具,让孩子们单独离开。儿童的二元后来被实验者采访了他们如何处理这条规则。在整个面试阶段编码非语言行为,他们可以通过扣留违规(即,遗漏)和儿童选择撒谎或讲述真相的目标问题(即,由委员会撒谎)之后撒谎。真实的柜员和谎言表明(1)响应延迟的差异,看着朋友,并在目标问题之后使用手势,但在整个面试中的互动非语言行为中(2)类似(即语音转换) ,看着朋友和话语率)。这是第一项研究表明,当在自发欺骗性背景下进行集体面试时,围绕谎言行为的非语言行为与计划的欺骗性背景相反。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号