首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Microscopy >Comparison of hyperspectral classification methods for the analysis of cerium oxide nanoparticles in histological and aqueous samples
【24h】

Comparison of hyperspectral classification methods for the analysis of cerium oxide nanoparticles in histological and aqueous samples

机译:组织学和水性样品中氧化铈纳米粒子分析的高光谱分类方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Summary Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) and classification are established methods that are being applied in new ways to the analysis of nanoscale materials in a variety of matrices. Typically, enhanced darkfield microscopy (EDFM)‐based HSI data (also known as image datacubes) are collected in the wavelength range of 400–1000 nm for each pixel in a datacube. Utilising different spectral library (SL) creation methods, spectra from pixels in the datacube corresponding to known materials can be collected into reference spectral libraries (RSLs), which can be used to classify materials in datacubes of experimental samples using existing classification algorithms. In this study, EDFM‐HSI was used to visualise and analyse industrial cerium oxide (CeO 2 ; ceria) nanoparticles (NPs) in rat lung tissues and in aqueous suspension. Rats were exposed to ceria NPs via inhalation, mimicking potential real‐world occupational exposures. The lung tissues were histologically prepared: some tissues were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and some were left unstained. The goal of this study was to determine how HSI and classification results for ceria NPs were influenced by (1) the use of different RSL creation and classification methods and (2) the application of those methods to samples in different matrices (stained tissue, unstained tissue, or aqueous solution). Three different RSL creation methods – particle filtering (PF), manual selection, and spectral hourglass wizard (SHW) – were utilised to create the RSLs of known materials in unstained and stained tissue, and aqueous suspensions, which were then used to classify the NPs in the different matrices. Two classification algorithms – spectral angle mapper (SAM) and spectral feature fitting (SFF) – were utilised to determine the presence or absence of ceria NPs in each sample. The results from the classification algorithms were compared to determine how each influenced the classification results for samples in different matrices. The results showed that sample matrix and sample preparation significantly influenced the NP classification thresholds in the complex matrices. Moreover, considerable differences were observed in the classification results when utilising each RSL creation and classification method for each type of sample. Results from this study illustrate the importance of appropriately selecting HSI algorithms based on specific material and matrix characteristics in order to obtain optimal classification results. As HSI is increasingly utilised for NP characterisation for clinical, environmental and health and safety applications, this investigation is important for further refining HSI protocols while ensuring appropriate data collection and analysis.
机译:发明内容高光谱成像(HSI)和分类是建立在各种基质中纳米级材料分析的新方法的方法。通常,基于增强的暗区显微镜(EDFM)的基于HSI数据(也称为图像数据码)在Datacube中的每个像素的每个像素的波长范围内收集在400-1000nm的波长范围内。利用不同的光谱库(SL)创建方法,可以收集与已知材料的DATACUB中的像素中的像素的光谱可以收集到参考光谱库(RSL)中,其可以使用使用现有的分类算法对实验样本的DATACUB中的材料进行分类。在本研究中,EDFM-HSI用于在大鼠肺组织和含水悬浮液中可视化和分析工业氧化铈(CEO 2; CERIA)纳米颗粒(NPS)。大鼠通过吸入暴露于Ceria NPS,模仿潜在的真实职业暴露。肺组织在组织学上制备:一些组织用苏木精和曙红(H& e)染色,有些组织未被染色。本研究的目标是确定Ceria NPS的HSI和分类结果受(1)使用不同的RSL创作和分类方法和(2)将这些方法应用于不同矩阵中的样本(染色组织,未染色组织或水溶液)。三种不同的RSL创建方法 - 粒子滤波(PF),手动选择和光谱沙漏向导(SHW) - 用于在未持染色和染色的组织中创建已知材料的RSL,然后用于分类NPS的含水悬浮液在不同的矩阵中。两个分类算法 - 光谱角映射器(SAM)和光谱特征拟合(SAFF) - 用于确定每个样品中的Ceria NP的存在或不存在。比较分类算法的结果,以确定各自如何影响不同矩阵中的样本的分类结果。结果表明,样品基质和样品制剂显着影响了复杂基质中的NP分类阈值。此外,当利用每种类型样本的每个RSL创建和分类方法时,在分类结果中观察到了相当大的差异。 Results from this study illustrate the importance of appropriately selecting HSI algorithms based on specific material and matrix characteristics in order to obtain optimal classification results.由于HSI越来越多地用于临床,环境和健康和安全应用的NP表征,这项调查对于进一步精炼的HSI协议非常重要,同时确保适当的数据收集和分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号