首页> 外文期刊>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology >Hysterscopic Resection of Premalignant and Malignant Endometrial Polyps: Is it a Safe Alternative to Hysterectomy?
【24h】

Hysterscopic Resection of Premalignant and Malignant Endometrial Polyps: Is it a Safe Alternative to Hysterectomy?

机译:宫腔镜切除术前肠道和恶性子宫内膜息肉:是一种安全的子宫切除术替代品吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Study Objective The standard treatment of endometrial cancer (EC) and complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) is hysterectomy with or without adnexectomy. In the last decade several centers have attempted to perform hysteroscopic resection of malignant and premalignant polyps as an alternative to hysterectomy. In the present study we evaluated the safety of this procedure in regard to residual uterine pathology. Design Retrospective chart review (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting University hospital. Patients Women (n?=?1766) who underwent hysteroscopic polypectomy during the years 1998 to 2016. Interventions Patients with CAH and endometrioid type EC in the removed polyps who underwent hysterectomy were included in the study. Patients with nonendometrioid pathology were excluded. The operative and pathologic reports of the hysteroscopy and hysterectomy procedures were revised. Measurements and Main Results Forty-three women (2.4%) were diagnosed with premalignant and malignant polyps: 21 with EC and 22 with CAH. Thirty-four women (79.0%) underwent hysterectomy and were included in the study group. The median age was 62 years (range, 35–83). Most women (79.4%) presented with postmenopausal bleeding or menorrhagia. In 13 patients (38.2%) more than 1 polyp was removed. The median size of the polyps was 2?cm (range, 1–4). In 27 women there were no other visible endometrial findings during the hysteroscopy except for the removed polyp. However, in 24 women (88.9%) residual CAH or EC was present in the hysterectomy specimen, mostly (55.6%) as multifocal lesions. Conclusion Our results indicate that hysteroscopic evaluation of the uterine cavity and polyp resection are not enough for the eradication of premalignant and malignant endometrial lesions. This alternative should be reserved for well-selected cases such as for fertility preservation and for patient with surgical risk factors that after the hysteroscopic polypectomy will receive further medical treatment. ]]>
机译:摘要研究目的子宫内膜癌(EC)和复杂的非典型增生(CAH)的标准治疗是有或没有adnexectomy的子宫切除术。在过去的十年中,几个中心试图对恶性肿瘤和急性息肉的宫腔镜切除作为子宫切除术的替代品。在本研究中,我们评估了该过程关于残留子宫病理学的安全性。设计回顾性图表评论(加拿大工作组分类II-2)。培养大学医院。患者(n?= 1766)妇女在1998年至2016年期间接受了宫腔镜题染的患者。在研究中,CAH和子宫内甲状腺体IC患者的干预患者被纳入研究息肉切除术。排除了非族化体病理学患者。修订了宫腔镜检查和子宫切除术手术的手术和病理报告。测量和主要结果43项女性(2.4%)被诊断出含热剂和恶性息肉:21例用EC和22次含CAH。三十四名女性(79.0%)接受子宫切除术,并包括在研究组中。中位年龄为62岁(范围,35-83)。大多数女性(79.4%)呈现出绝经后血型出血或美甲群。在13名患者中(38.2%)除去超过1个息肉。息肉的中位数为2?cm(范围,1-4)。在27名女性中,宫腔镜检查中没有其他可见的子宫内膜发现,除了移除息肉。然而,在24名女性(88.9%)中存在残留的CAH或EC,存在于子宫切除术标本中,主要是(55.6%)作为多焦点病变。结论我们的结果表明,子宫腔和息肉切除的宫腔镜评估不足以消除过急性和恶性子宫内膜病变。应保留这种替代方案,以适用于精选的病例,例如用于生育保存和具有外科危险因素的患者,在宫腔镜脊髓抑制术后接受进一步的医疗后。 ]]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号