首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurotrauma >Variation in Blood Transfusion and Coagulation Management in Traumatic Brain Injury at the Intensive Care Unit: A Survey in 66 Neurotrauma Centers Participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury Study
【24h】

Variation in Blood Transfusion and Coagulation Management in Traumatic Brain Injury at the Intensive Care Unit: A Survey in 66 Neurotrauma Centers Participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury Study

机译:重症监护单位创伤性脑损伤中输血和凝血管理的变异:66个神经统计中心参与创伤性脑损伤研究中的欧洲神经统治效果研究的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Our aim was to describe current approaches and to quantify variability between European intensive care units (ICUs) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Therefore, we conducted a provider profiling survey as part of the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study. The ICU Questionnaire was sent to 68 centers from 20 countries across Europe and Israel. For this study, we used ICU questions focused on 1) hemoglobin target level (Hb-TL), 2) coagulation management, and 3) deep venous thromboembolism (DVT) prophylaxis. Seventy-eight participants, mostly intensivists and neurosurgeons of 66 centers, completed the ICU questionnaire. For ICU-patients, half of the centers (N=34; 52%) had a defined Hb-TL in their protocol. For patients with TBI, 26 centers (41%) indicated an Hb-TL between 70 and 90g/L and 38 centers (59%) above 90g/L. To treat trauma-related hemostatic abnormalities, the use of fresh frozen plasma (N=48; 73%) or platelets (N=34; 52%) was most often reported, followed by the supplementation of vitamin K (N=26; 39%). Most centers reported using DVT prophylaxis with anticoagulants frequently or always (N=62; 94%). In the absence of hemorrhagic brain lesions, 14 centers (21%) delayed DVT prophylaxis until 72h after trauma. If hemorrhagic brain lesions were present, the number of centers delaying DVT prophylaxis for 72h increased to 29 (46%). Overall, a lack of consensus exists between European ICUs on blood transfusion and coagulation management. The results provide a baseline for the CENTER-TBI study, and the large between-center variation indicates multiple opportunities for comparative effectiveness research.
机译:我们的目的是描述目前的方法,并在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者中量化欧洲重症监护单位(ICU)之间的可变性。因此,我们通过创伤性脑损伤(中心-TBI)研究中的欧洲合作效能研究的一部分,进行了提供商分析调查。 ICU问卷由欧洲和以色列的20个国家发送到68个中心。对于这项研究,我们使用ICU问题重点关注1)血红蛋白目标水平(HB-T1),2)凝血管理和3)深静脉血栓栓塞(DVT)预防。七十八名参与者,主要是66个中心的强烈主义者和神经外科医生,完成了ICU问卷。对于ICU-患者,其中一半的中心(n = 34; 52%)在其方案中具有定义的HB-TL。对于TBI的患者,26个中心(41%)表示70至90g / L和38个中心(59%)以上的HB-T1。为了治疗创伤相关的止血异常,通常报道使用新鲜冷冻等离子体(n = 48; 73%)或血小板(n = 34; 52%),然后补充维生素K(n = 26; 39 %)。大多数中心报告使用DVT预防与抗凝血剂频繁或总是(n = 62; 94%)。在没有出血性脑病变的情况下,14个中心(21%)延迟DVT预防直至创伤后72h。如果存在出血性脑病变,则延迟DVT预防72h的中心数量增加至29(46%)。总体而言,欧洲疾病危险与凝固管理缺乏共识缺乏共识。结果为中心-TBI研究提供了基线,而中心之间的大量变化表明了对比较有效性研究的多种机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号