首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurosurgical sciences >PERSPECTIVES OF HEGEMONY IN THE EASTERN ASIA IN LIGHT OF THE WORLD-SYSTEM APPROACH
【24h】

PERSPECTIVES OF HEGEMONY IN THE EASTERN ASIA IN LIGHT OF THE WORLD-SYSTEM APPROACH

机译:鉴于世界系统的方法,霸权在东亚霸权的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The world-system approach, which nowadays is seen as a wide range of interdisciplinary researches, studies the human world as a primarily interconnected and hierarchically organized system, where there is always a Center eligible for hegemony, a subordinate periphery and a half-periphery that possesses its own reproduction resources. In terms of evaluating the perspectives and creating scenarios of to-be balance of power in the Eastern Asia, this approach allows considering that the world system has reached the new phase envelope, to which the previous criteria cannot be fully applicable. Economic power of modern humanity reached the volume that allows to overpass the very market dependence of periphery from the Center, which is generally typical for the world economy. The cultural determinants of generation and diffusion of innovations assume greater importance as part of the process forming a new relational system, which can be called "world culture". Such a principle of system integration means the irrelevance of that form of hegemony, typical for the previous world economy. Against the background of universal mobility and extraordinary significance of human capital, the states as centers of power (power politics) are involved into a special type of business struggle as Attractive Centers for the capital of this kind, where "creative community" is a key element. Considering these factors, one can predict the end of hegemony as a notion and the beginning of the genuine multipolar world. The USA would secure the leadership as a top creative economy, but cannot be characterized as a hegemon anymore because of the absence of leverage on decision-making process in "sequacious" countries and regions. China as a leader in Eastern Asia would not count on being a hegemon in old terms, and even in new ones, due to ethnic and political factors inherent to Chinese people that preclude it from taking the lead of the global "creative community".
机译:现在,世界系统的方法被视为广泛的跨学科研究,将人类世界作为一个主要互连和分层组织的系统研究,其中总有一个有资格获得霸权的中心,下属周边和半周边拥有自己的再生资源。就评估了东亚的能力平衡的观点和创造了方案而言,这种方法允许考虑到世界系统已达到新的阶段信封,以前标准不能完全适用。现代人类的经济力量达到了允许超越中心的市场依赖的卷,这对世界经济通常是典型的。创新的发电和传播的文化决定因素是作为形成新关系系统的过程的一部分,这是一个更重要的重要性,这可以称为“世界文化”。这种系统整合原则意味着这种形式的霸权的无关,典型为以前的世界经济。在普遍流动性和人力资本的非凡意义的背景下,作为权力中心(权力政治)的国家涉及一种特殊类型的商业斗争,因为这种资本的有吸引力的中心,那里的“创意社区”是一个关键元素。考虑到这些因素,人们可以预测霸权的结束作为真正的多极体世界的概念和开始。美国将把领导人视为一个最重要的创造性经济,但由于在“瑞典”国家和地区的决策过程中没有杠杆,不能再被尊重霸主。中国作为东亚的领导者不依赖于旧条款的霸权,甚至在新的人中,由于中国人固有的族裔和政治因素,这阻止了它的领先“创意社区”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号