...
首页> 外文期刊>The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon >Influence of Medication-Induced Preconditioning or Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on the Intrinsic Vascular Extracellular RNA/Ribonuclease System in Cardioprotection
【24h】

Influence of Medication-Induced Preconditioning or Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on the Intrinsic Vascular Extracellular RNA/Ribonuclease System in Cardioprotection

机译:药物诱导的预处理或远程缺血预处理对心脏保护中的内在血管细胞外RNA /核糖核酸酶系统的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background It has been demonstrated that remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) increases ribonuclease (RNase) levels and protects the heart by reducing extracellular ribonucleic acid (eRNA). As medication-induced preconditioning (MIPC) is also a powerful tool for cardioprotection, we examined the influence of both types of preconditioning on the eRNA/RNase system. Methods In 17 male rats, RIPC (3 x 5 minute hind-leg ischemia) or MIPC (isoflurane and buprenorphine anesthesia) was performed. Five rats served as control and did not undergo preconditioning (non-MIPC). After preconditioning, eRNA levels and RNase activity were determined in plasma, and the hearts were mounted on a blood-perfused Langendorff ischemia/reperfusion apparatus. Hemodynamic, metabolic, and electron microscopic parameters were determined. Furthermore, MIPC with one anesthetic drug only (isoflurane, buprenorphine, or etomidate) was induced in another five rats. After 30 minutes, eRNA levels and RNase activity were determined and compared with an RIPC group ( n = 5). Results The plasma of RIPC-treated rats had higher RNase activity and lower eRNA levels than that of MIPC-treated rats. In addition, RIPC increased RNase activity more than MIPC with one drug alone. The RNase activity and eRNA levels in these MIPC groups differed considerably. Hemodynamic parameters of RIPC- and MIPC-treated hearts were better preserved after 90-minute ischemia than those of non-MIPC hearts. No obvious differences were noted between MIPC and RIPC regarding hemodynamics, metabolism, or structural parameters. Conclusions Our results suggest that RIPC does not have any additional cardioprotective benefit in this experimental system. However, the influence of RIPC on the eRNA/RNase system was greater than that of MIPC.
机译:背景技术已经证明,远程缺血预处理(RIPC)增加了核糖核酸酶(RNase)水平并通过减少细胞外核糖核酸(erna)来保护心脏。作为药物诱导的预处理(MIPC)也是心脏保护的强大工具,我们检查了两种类型的预处理对ERNA / RNase系统的影响。方法在17例雄性大鼠中,进行RIPC(3×5分钟后腿缺血)或MIPC(异氟醚和丁丙诺啡麻醉)。五只大鼠用作对照,并没有进行预处理(非MIPC)。在预处理后,在血浆中测定ERNA水平和RNase活性,并且将心脏安装在血液灌注的Langendorff缺血/再灌注装置上。确定血流动力学,代谢和电子显微镜参数。此外,在另外五只大鼠中诱导了仅具有一种麻醉药物(异氟醚,丁丙沙甲酰胺或膦酸酯)的MIPC。 30分钟后,测定erna水平和RNase活性并与RIPC组(n = 5)进行比较。结果RIPC处理大鼠的血浆具有较高的RNase活性和低于MIPC处理大鼠的阶段。此外,RIPC比MIPC增加了RNase活性,单独使用一种药物。这些MIPC组中的RNase活动和ERNA水平有很大不同。在90分钟的缺血之后,RIPC和MIPC处理的心脏的血流动力学参数比非MIPC心脏的缺血更好地保存。在MIPC和RIPC方面没有关于血流动力学,新陈代谢或结构参数之间的明显差异。结论我们的结果表明RIPC在该实验系统中没有任何额外的心脏保护益。然而,RIPC对ERNA / RNase系统的影响大于MIPC的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号