首页> 外文期刊>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI >Clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in patients with prostate cancer: can ADC values contribute to assess the aggressiveness of prostate cancer?
【24h】

Clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in patients with prostate cancer: can ADC values contribute to assess the aggressiveness of prostate cancer?

机译:前列腺癌患者表观扩散系数(ADC)值的临床效用:ADC值是否有助于评估前列腺癌的侵袭性?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and Gleason score (GS) in prostate cancer. METHODS: A total of 60 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer were selected for this study. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images were obtained using a 1.5 T system. ADC values were analyzed between three groups: GS of 6 or less (n = 7); GS of 7 (n = 37); and GS of 8 or higher (n = 16). ADC values of the three GS groups were statistically analyzed in order to determine the relationship with GS. In the 37 patients with GS = 7 the difference in ADC values between GS 3+4 and GS 4+3 was analyzed. RESULTS: Median ADC values (10(3) mm(2) /s) of the three GS groups were 1.04 (GS = 6 or less), 0.867 (GS = 7), and 0.729 (GS = 8 or higher). Although there was considerable overlap among the groups, the differences in ADC were statistically significant (P < 0.0001). There was a significant inverse correlation between GS and ADC values (z = -0.437, P < 0.0005). Median ADC values (10(3) mm(2) /s) of GS 3+4 and GS 4+3 patients were 0.88 and 0.814, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: ADC values showed a negative correlation with GS. Pathologically, however, there was considerable intrasubject heterogeneity.
机译:目的:回顾性地评估前列腺癌中表观扩散系数(ADC)值和GLEASIN评分(GS)之间的关系。方法:为这项研究选择了60例接受临床局部前列腺癌的自由基前列腺切除术的患者。使用1.5 T系统获得扩散加权磁共振(MR)图像。分析ADC值在三组之间:GS为6或更低(n = 7); GS为7(n = 37); GS为8或更高(n = 16)。三个GS组的ADC值在统计上分析,以便确定与GS的关系。在37例GS = 7患者中,分析了GS 3 + 4和GS 4 + 3之间的ADC值的差异。结果:三个GS基团的中值ADC值(10(3)毫米(2)/ s)为1.04(GS = 6或更低),0.867(GS = 7)和0.729(GS = 8或更高)。虽然群体中存在相当大的重叠,但ADC的差异统计学意义(P <0.0001)。 GS和ADC值之间存在显着的反比相关性(Z = -0.437,P <0.0005)。 GS 3 + 4和GS 4 + 3患者的中值ADC值(10(3)mm(2)/ s)分别为0.88和0.814(P <0.05)。结论:ADC值显示与GS负相关。然而,病理学上存在相当大的胃胆内异质性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号