首页> 外文期刊>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI >Analysis of aortic pressure fields from 4D flow MRI in healthy volunteers: Associations with age and left ventricular remodeling
【24h】

Analysis of aortic pressure fields from 4D flow MRI in healthy volunteers: Associations with age and left ventricular remodeling

机译:健康志愿者4D流动MRI主动脉压力场分析:与年龄和左心室重塑的关联

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Aging‐related arterial stiffness is associated with substantial changes in global and local arterial pressures. The subsequent early return of reflected pressure waves leads to an elevated left ventricular (LV) afterload and ultimately to a deleterious concentric LV remodeling. Purpose To compute aortic time‐resolved pressure fields of healthy subjects from 4D flow MRI and to define relevant pressure‐based markers while investigating their relationship with age, LV remodeling, as well as tonometric augmentation index (AIx) and pulse wave velocity (PWV). Study Type Retrospective. Population Forty‐seven healthy subjects (age: 49.5?±?18?years, 24 women). Field Strength/Sequence 3?T/4D flow MRI. Assessment Spatiotemporal pressure fields were computed by integrating velocity‐derived pressure gradients using Navier–Stokes equations, while assuming zero pressure at the sino‐tubular junction. To quantify aortic pressure spatiotemporal variations, we defined the following markers: 1) volumetric aortic pressure propagation rates ΔP E1 /ΔV and ΔP E2 /ΔV , representing variations of early and late systolic relative pressure peaks along the aorta, respectively, according to the cumulated aortic volume; 2) ΔA PE1‐PE2 defined in four aortic regions as the absolute difference between early and late systolic relative pressure peaks amplitude. Statistical Tests Linear regression, Wilcoxon rank sum test, Bland–Altman analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results Spatiotemporal variations of aortic pressure peaks were moderately to highly reproducible (ICC ≥0.50) and decreased significantly with age, in terms of absolute magnitude: ΔP E1 /ΔV ( r ?=?0.70, P ??0.005), ΔP E2 /ΔV ( r ?=?–0.45, P ??0.005) and ΔA PE1‐PE2 (| r |??0.39, P ??0.005). ΔP E1 /ΔV was associated with LV remodeling ( r ?=?0.53, P ??0.001) and ascending aorta ΔA PE1‐PE2 was associated with AIx ( r ?=?–0.59, P ??0.001). Both associations were independent of age and systolic blood pressures. Only weak associations were found between pressure indices and PWV ( r ?≤?0.40). Data Conclusion 4D flow MRI relative aortic pressures were consistent with physiological knowledge as demonstrated by their significant volumetric and temporal variations with age and their independent association with LV remodeling and augmentation index. Level of Evidence 2 Technical Efficacy Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:982–993.
机译:背景技术衰老相关的动脉僵硬与全球和局部动脉压力的大量变化有关。反射压力波的随后早期返回导致左心室(LV)的左右升高,最终达到有害的同心LV重塑。目的,用于计算来自4D流动MRI的健康受试者的主动脉震位的压力场,并在调查其与年龄,LV重塑和脉冲波速度(PWV)的关系中确定相关的基于压力的标记,同时定义相关的压力基标记,以及脉冲波速度(PWV) 。研究类型回顾。人口四十七个健康科目(年龄:49.5?±18岁?年,24岁)。场强/序列3?T / 4D流动MRI。通过使用Navier-Stokes方程积分速度衍生的压力梯度来计算评估时空压力场,同时在施加零压力下对零压力进行零压力来计算。为了量化主动脉压力发短型变化,我们定义了以下标记:1)体积主动脉压力传播速率ΔPE1/ΔV和ΔPE2/ΔV,根据累积分别表示沿主动脉的早期和后期收缩压峰值的变化主动脉卷; 2)Δape1-pe2在四个主动脉区域中定义,作为早期和晚期收缩压峰值幅度之间的绝对差异。统计测试线性回归,Wilcoxon等级测试,Bland-Altman分析和跨读类相关系数(ICC)。结果主动脉压力峰的时尚变化适度至高度可重复(ICC≥0.50),并且在绝对幅度方面,随着年龄的年龄显着下降:ΔPE1/ΔV(r?= 0.70,p≤x≤02,Δpe2 /ΔV(r?=Δ - 0.45,p≤≤0.005)和Δape1-pe2(| r |α& 0.39,p≤≤0.005)。 ΔPE1/ΔV与LV重塑相关(R?= 0.53,p≤10.53,p≤01)和升压主动脉ΔAPE1-PE2与AIX(Rα=Δ-0.59,p≤≤0.001)相关。两项关联都与年龄和收缩压血压无关。压力指数和PWV之间仅发现薄弱的关联(R?≤≤0.40)。数据结论4D流程MRI相对主动脉压力与生理学知识一致,如其具有年龄的显着的体积和时间变化及其与LV重塑和增强指数的独立关联的显着体积和时间变化。证据水平2技术效果阶段3 J. MANG。恢复。 2019年成像; 50:982-993。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号