首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Mathematical Psychology >Incorrect responses in the response time interaction contrast
【24h】

Incorrect responses in the response time interaction contrast

机译:响应时间交互对比度不正确响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Townsend and Nozawa (1995) derived predictions for response time interaction contrasts that distinguish several classes of cognitive architectures (serial, parallel, coactive, exhaustive, self-terminating) in double factorial experiments. Their original theorems were limited to experimental tasks with ceiling accuracy. In this theoretical note I investigate systems factorial technology (SFT) within two canonical classes of models generating incorrect responses, namely, models with independent racers for informed responses and guesses, and models with mutually exclusive separate states for informed responding and guessing. I derive generalized interaction contrasts under these two model classes; these turn out to be related to the Kaplan-Meier and Aalen-Johansen estimators known from survival analysis. I discuss the limitations of the SFT approach if the incorrect responses arise from the component processes, and propose an alternative experimental setup that varies the temporal onset of the stimulus components. I demonstrate that with onset delay, SFT methodology can be generalized to non-perfect accuracy, and I point out the consequences for response time experimentation. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:Townsend和Nozawa(1995)导出了对响应时间交互的预测对比,使若干类认知架构(串行,平行,结束,自我终端)中的双因子实验中的响应时间相对造影。他们的原始定理仅限于天花板精度的实验任务。在这个理论上,我在两种规范类别的模型中调查系统阶乘技术(SFT),即产生不正确的响应,即具有独立赛车手的模型,用于了解知识的响应和猜测,以及具有相互排斥的响应和猜测的不同单独状态的模型。我派生了这两个模型类的广义交互;这些结果与来自生存分析中的Kaplan-Meier和Aalen-Johansen估算有关。如果从组件过程中出现不正确的响应,我讨论了SFT方法的局限性,并提出了一种改变刺激组分的时间发作的替代实验设置。我证明,由于发病延迟,SFT方法可以推广到非完美的准确性,并且我指出了对响应时间实验的后果。 (c)2019 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号