...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of land use science >Power in participatory processes: reflections from multi-stakeholder workshops in the Horn of Africa
【24h】

Power in participatory processes: reflections from multi-stakeholder workshops in the Horn of Africa

机译:参与进程中的权力:非洲角的多利益相关方研讨会的思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The sustainability science literature views the participation of local stakeholders as a necessary element for both conducting transdisciplinary research and implementing sustainable development projects. However, there is very little critical reflection on how power dynamics between researchers and local stakeholders affect the success of participatory processes. This article draws on the critical tradition of political science and sociology to examine how power dynamics are inherent to, and should always be a concern during, participatory processes. This also applies for sustainability science research and the implementation of sustainable development projects, especially in developing contexts such as those of Africa. While local participation enhances the voices of local stakeholders, power dynamics between them and the researchers driving these processes can dampen local voices or elide critical pieces of information. Using evidence from participatory workshops in Djibouti and Kenya, we demonstrate that these power dynamics can unintentionally exclude critical knowledge and perspectives from the formal proceedings of participatory workshops, despite an express focus on stakeholder inclusion and participatory methods. Using Steven Lukes' tripartite conception of power, we elicit how the workshop structure and the actions of researchers as the designers and facilitators of the workshop may have prevented the emergence of this critical information. The central argument is that reflecting on power will help researchers and practitioners identify the power dynamics inherent in the participatory processes so they can work to overcome them. Such self-reflection can strengthen sustainability science and practice in African and other contexts.
机译:可持续发展科学文献认为当地利益攸关方的参与是进行跨学科研究和实施可持续发展项目的必要因素。但是,关于研究人员和当地利益相关者之间的力量影响如何影响参与性过程的成功。本文借鉴了政治科学和社会学的批判传统,以研究权力动态如何固有,并且应该始终是参与进程的关注。这也适用于可持续发展科学研究和可持续发展项目的实施,特别是在制定非洲诸如诸如非洲的背景下。虽然本地参与增强了当地利益相关者的声音,但它们之间的权力动力和推动这些过程的研究人员可以挫败本地声音或ELINE关键信息。使用吉布提和肯尼亚参与式研讨会的证据,我们证明这些权力动态可以无意中从参与式研讨会的正式诉讼中无意中排除关键知识和观点,尽管表达了对利益攸关方的包容和参与性方法。使用Steven Lukes的三方的权力概念,我们引起了研讨会结构和研究人员的行动,作为研讨会的设计师和促进者可能会阻止出现这种关键信息。中央论点是,反映权力将有助于研究人员和从业者确定参与过程中固有的权力动态,以便他们可以努力克服它们。这种自我反思可以加强非洲和其他背景的可持续性科学和实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号