...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of investigative surgery: The official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research >Comparison of Hidden Blood Loss Between Three Different Surgical Approaches for Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fracture
【24h】

Comparison of Hidden Blood Loss Between Three Different Surgical Approaches for Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fracture

机译:三种不同外科曲面治疗胸腰椎骨折的隐性失血的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: To examine the hidden blood loss (HBL) in treatment of AO type A1-A3 thoracolumbar fractures with three different approaches and to explore the influential factors of HBL among patients after the surgery of internal fixation for thoracolumbar fractures. Methods: We retrospectively studied 85 patients in treatment of thoracolumbar fractures: 25 patients via percutaneous approach (Group A), 33 patients via paraspinal approach (Group B), and 27 patients via conventional open approach (Group C). The demographic information of the patients was collected. Each patient's preoperative and postoperative hematocrit were recorded and used for calculating the blood loss according to the Gross's formula. The difference of blood loss between the three groups was measured by ANOVA. And influential factors were further analyzed by multivariate linear regression analysis in each group. Results: The average HBL was 240.0 +/- 65.1 mL in Group A, 313.7 +/- 138.1 mL in Group B, and 382 +/- 153.8 mL in Group C. There was statistical difference in the HBL between three groups (P = 0.000). However, multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that HBL of three approaches was not associated with age, gender, body mass index (BMI), percentage of height loss, percentage of height restoration, fracture type, or operation time. Conclusion: There was a substantial HBL in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures, which was neglected by surgeons. Further investigation is necessary to study the risk factors for surgery on HBL in treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.
机译:目的:检查用三种不同方法治疗AO型A1-A3胸骨骨折的隐患(HBL),探讨胸腔内固定后患者HBL的影响因素。方法:我们回顾性研究了85名胸腰椎骨折治疗患者:25例通过经皮方法(A组),33名患者通过匍匐方法(B组)和27名患者通过常规开放方法(C组)。收集患者的人口统计信息。记录每位患者的术前和术后血细胞比容,并用于计算根据总配方的血液损失。通过Anova测量三组之间的血液损失差异。通过每组多变量线性回归分析进一步分析了影响因素。结果:B组,313.7 +/- 138.1ml的平均HBL为240.0 +/- 65.1ml,C组中的382 +/- 153.8ml。三组之间的HBL差异有统计学差异(P = 0.000)。然而,多变量线性回归分析显示,三种方法的HBL与年龄,性别,体重指数(BMI),高度损失百分比,高度恢复,断裂型或操作时间的百分比无关。结论:胸腰椎骨折治疗有一个实质性的HBL,由外科医生忽略。进一步调查对于研究HBL治疗胸腰椎骨折的手术危险因素是必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号