首页> 外文期刊>Journal of investigative surgery: The official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research >A Comparison of Emergency First Presentations of Colorectal Cancer in Under-50 and Over-50 Year-Old Patients
【24h】

A Comparison of Emergency First Presentations of Colorectal Cancer in Under-50 and Over-50 Year-Old Patients

机译:50岁及50多名历史患者结直肠癌紧急型癌症的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction:Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second commonest malignancy related death in Western Europe with incidence increasing in young adults. 31% of UK patients with CRC present as emergencies. We compare the incidence, characteristics, management and outcomes in two cohorts presenting as CRC emergencies; under-50 and over-50 years old.Materials and Methods:Retrospective analysis was performed on 322 patients with emergency presentations of CRC over a 9-year period (January 2005-December 2013, West Suffolk Hospital, UK). Data were analyzed for demographics, symptoms, investigations, stage, grade, genetics, tumor location, management, and mortality.Results:300 patients over 50 years old presented with CRC emergencies; 153 women (51%):147 men (49%); median age 77 years (interquartile range: 67-84). 22 patients under 50-years-old; 12 women (55%):10 men (45%); median age 43 years ([Interquartile Range (IQR)]: 35-46 years). Bowel obstruction was less common in under-50s (18.2% vs. 40.7%;p = 0.04). No over-50s had a positive family history for CRC; 7 under-50s did. A higher proportion of under-50s presented with Dukes A carcinomas (14.3% vs. 0.4%;p = 0.002), but no difference in other Dukes stages. Surgery was performed in a higher proportion of under-50s (95.5% vs. 77.0%;p = 0.04) and a higher proportion had same day surgery (71.4% vs. 28.1%;p = 0.01). Overall mortality was lower in under-50s (36.4% vs. 64.0%;p = 0.02). No significant differences occurred in in-hospital mortality (4.7% vs. 8.0%;p = 0.55), overall one-year survival (31.8% vs. 41.7%;p = 0.36), or median survival to death or study conclusion (27.1 vs. 19.6 months;p = 0.13).Conclusion:Emergency CRC had comparable outcomes between young and old cohorts, during the study time period. Younger patients were more likely to undergo operative interventions but overall survival was comparable. Our study was limited by the reporting biases intrinsic to retrospective analyses and by a small under-50 sample size. Further large-scale studies are warranted to support observations.
机译:介绍:结肠直肠癌(CRC)是西欧中最初的怀力相关死亡,在年轻人中发病率增加。 31%的英国CRC患者作为紧急情况。我们比较两个队列的发病,特征,管理和结果作为CRC紧急情况; 50岁以下和50岁以上的历史。材料和方法:回顾性分析在322名CRC患者上进行了CRC的322名9年期(2005年1月 - 2013年12月,英国西萨福克医院)。分析数据用于人口统计,症状,调查,阶段,等级,遗传学,肿瘤地点,管理和死亡率。结果:300例50岁以上的患者介绍了CRC紧急情况; 153名女性(51%):147名男子(49%);中位年龄77岁(四分位数范围:67-84)。 22例50岁以下的患者; 12名女性(55%):10人(45%);中位年龄43年([四分位数范围(IQR)]:35-46岁)。肠梗阻不太常见于50岁以下(18.2%vs.40.7%; P = 0.04)。没有超过50岁的CRC的历史积极的家族史; 7岁以下的50岁了。伴随着癌症癌的50岁以下的较高比例(14.3%vs.0.4%; p = 0.002),但在其他公爵阶段没有差异。手术以低于50岁以下的比例进行(95.5%vs.77.0%; p = 0.04),比例较高,同日手术(71.4%与28.1%; p = 0.01)。 50岁以下的总体死亡率降低(36.4%与64.0%; P = 0.02)。在医院内死亡率没有发生显着差异(4.7%vs.8.0%; p = 0.55),整体一年存活(31.8%对41.7%; p = 0.36),或中位生存到死亡或研究结论(27.1与19.6个月; P = 0.13)。结论:在研究期间,紧急情况CRC在年轻和旧队列之间具有相当的结果。年轻的患者更有可能经历手术干预,但整体存活率是可比的。我们的研究受到报告偏见的限制,内在的回顾性分析和小于50次的样本大小。进一步的大规模研究是为了支持观察。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号