首页> 外文期刊>Journal of intensive care medicine >Cuff Leak Test for the Diagnosis of Post-Extubation Stridor: A Multicenter Evaluation Study
【24h】

Cuff Leak Test for the Diagnosis of Post-Extubation Stridor: A Multicenter Evaluation Study

机译:封顶后诊断的袖带泄漏试验:多中心评估研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Cuff leak test was developed to predict the occurrence of post-extubation stridor (PES). This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of this test in unselected critically ill patients. Methods: Multicenter prospective study including unselected ventilated patients at the time of their first planned extubation. The diagnostic performance of 4 different cuff leak tests was assessed. Results: Post-extubation stridor occurred in 34 (9.4%) of 362 included patients. Compared to patients without PES, patients with PES required more frequently reintubation (6 [17.6%] vs 26 [7.9%], P = .041), prolonged duration of ventilation (6 [3-13] vs 5 [2-9] days, P = .029), and longer intensive care unit (ICU) stay (12 [6-17.5] vs 7.5 [4-13] days, P = .018). However, ICU mortality was similar in both groups (1 [2.9%] vs 23 [7.0%], P = .61). The 4 cuff leak tests display poor diagnostic accuracy: sensitivities ranging from 27% to 46%, specificities from 70% to 88%, positive predictive values from 14% to 19%, and negative predictive values from 92% to 93%. Conclusion: Post-extubation stridor occurs in less than 10% of unselected critically ill patients. The several cuff leak tests display limited diagnostic performance for the detection of PES. Given the high rate of false positives, routine cuff leak test may expose to undue prolonged mechanical ventilation.
机译:背景:开发了袖带泄漏试验以预测拔管后光滑(PE)的发生。本研究评估了该试验在未选择的批判性病患者中的诊断性能。方法:多中心前瞻性研究,包括在首次计划拔管时未选择的通风患者。评估了4种不同的袖带泄漏测试的诊断性能。结果:34(9.4%)的362名患者中发生后拔管前线。与没有PE的患者相比,PE的患者需要更频繁地重新涂布(6 [17.6%] Vs 26 [7.9%],P = .041),延长通风持续时间(6 [3-13] Vs 5 [2-9]天,p = .029),更长的重症监护室(ICU)停留(12 [6-17.5] Vs 7.5 [4-13]天,P = .018)。然而,两组的ICU死亡率相似(1 [2.9%] Vs 23 [7.0%],P = .61)。 4个袖带泄漏试验显示诊断准确性差:敏感性范围从27%到46%,特异性从70%到88%,阳性预测值从14%到19%,负面预测值从92%到93%。结论:拔下后脱硫在不到10%的未选择性危重患者中发生。几个袖带泄漏测试显示了对PE的检测有限的诊断性能。鉴于误报率高,常规袖带泄漏试验可能暴露于过度的延长机械通气。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号