首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hospital Medicine >Condom Catheters versus Indwelling Urethral Catheters in Men: A Prospective, Observational Study
【24h】

Condom Catheters versus Indwelling Urethral Catheters in Men: A Prospective, Observational Study

机译:避孕套导管与男性的留置尿道导管:一个前瞻性的观察研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

To assess complications of condom catheters compared with indwelling urethral catheters, we conducted a prospective cohort study in two Veterans Affairs hospitals. Male patients who used a condom catheter or indwelling urethral catheter during their hospital stay were followed for one month by interview and medical record review. Participants included 36 men who used condom catheters and 44 who used indwelling urethral catheters. At least one catheter-related complication was reported by 80.6% of condom catheter users and 88.6% of indwelling catheter users ( P = .32), and noninfectious complications (eg, leaking urine, pain, or discomfort) were more common than infectious complications in both groups. Condom catheter patients were significantly less likely than indwelling catheter patients to report complications during catheter placement (13.9% vs 43.2%; P < .001). Patients reported approximately three times more noninfectious complications than the number recorded in the medical record. (C) 2020 Society of Hospital Medicine
机译:为了评估避孕套导管的并发症与留置尿道导管相比,我们在两位退伍军人事务医院进行了一项未来的队列研究。在他们住院期间使用安全套导管或留置尿道导管的男性患者通过面试和医疗记录审查进行了一个月。参与者包括36名男性使用安全套导管和44谁使用留置尿道导管。报告了80.6%的避孕药插管使用者和88.6%的留置导管用户(P = .32),并且不排出并发症(例如,泄漏尿液,疼痛或不适),比传染性并发​​症更常见在这两个群体中。避孕套导管患者明显不太可能比留置导管患者在导管置入期间报告并发症(13.9%VS 43.2%; P <.001)。患者报告大约三倍的非排感并发症比记录中记录的数字更多。 (c)2020医院医学会

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号