首页> 外文期刊>Journal of infection and chemotherapy: official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy >Evaluation of three automated Treponema pallidum antibody assays for syphilis screening
【24h】

Evaluation of three automated Treponema pallidum antibody assays for syphilis screening

机译:梅毒筛查三种自动串联磷酸盐抗体测定的评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The accuracy of the test is critical for the syphilis serology diagnosis. This study aims to evaluate the values of the Elecsys syphilis assay, the Architect syphilis assay, and the Mindray syphilis assay, as syphilis screening tests for pregnant women and patients with syphilis or other diseases. A reverse algorithm was used for the syphilis serology diagnosis. Serum samples (n = 584) were tested with three automated screening assays. All reactive sera by one, two, or three screening assays were further analyzed with the tolulized red unheated serum test (TRUST). Inconsistent results were confirmed by the Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay (TPPA). The final patient diagnosis was made according to the results of syphilis serology, clinical evidence, and past medical history. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and kappa value of each assay were as follows: for the Elecsys syphilis assay, 100.0%, 98.5%, 98.6%, and 0.927, respectively; for the Architect syphilis assay: 100.0%, 94.5%, 95.0%, and 0.770; and for the Mindray syphilis assay: 100.0%, 97.0%, 97.3%, and 0.862. The McNemar test showed that there were significant differences in the performance between the Elecsys syphilis assay and the Architect syphilis assay (P < 0.001), and between the Mindray syphilis assay and the Architect syphilis assay (P = 0.001). Our study demonstrated that three automated Treponema pallidum antibody assays generally showed high sensitivities and specificities, and so, they are suitable for use in screening for syphilis. The performances of the Elecsys syphilis assay and the Mindray syphilis assay are superior to Architect syphilis assay.
机译:测试的准确性对于梅毒血清学诊断至关重要。本研究旨在评估Elecsys梅毒测定,建筑师梅毒测定和MindRay梅毒测定的价值,作为孕妇和梅毒或其他疾病患者的梅毒筛查试验。反向算法用于梅毒血清学诊断。用三种自动筛选测定检测血清样品(n = 584)。通过耐受的红色未加热的血清测试(信任)进一步分析所有反应性血清一,两种或三种筛选测定。通过Treponema磷酸盐颗粒凝集测定法(TPPA)证实了不一致的结果。最终患者诊断是根据梅毒血清学,临床证据和过去的病史的结果进行的。每个测定的敏感性,特异性,准确性和κ值如下:对于Elecsys梅毒测定,分别为100.0%,98.5%,98.6%和0.927%;对于建筑师梅毒试验:100.0%,94.5%,95.0%和0.770;对于MindRay梅毒测定:100.0%,97.0%,97.3%和0.862。 McNemar试验表明,Elecsys梅毒测定和建筑师梅毒测定(P <0.001)之间的性能存在显着差异,并且在MindRay梅毒测定和建筑师梅毒测定之间(P = 0.001)。我们的研究表明,三种自动化串杆菌菌抗体测定通常表现出高敏感性和特异性,因此,它们适用于筛选梅毒。 Elecsys Syphilis测定和MindRay梅毒测定的表演优于建筑师梅毒测定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号