首页> 外文期刊>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth: JGR >Comment on 'A New One-Equation Model of Fluid Drag for Irregularly Shaped Particles Valid Over a Wide Range of Reynolds Number' by F. Dioguardi et al.
【24h】

Comment on 'A New One-Equation Model of Fluid Drag for Irregularly Shaped Particles Valid Over a Wide Range of Reynolds Number' by F. Dioguardi et al.

机译:评论“对于不规则形状的颗粒的新型单位模型的流体拖曳的新型型号有效,由F. dioguardi等人有效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

With this comment we want to clarify a number of aspects of the paper recently published by Dioguardi, Mele, and Dellino "A New One-Equation Model of Fluid Drag for Irregularly Shaped Particles Valid Over a Wide Range of Reynolds Number" (hereafter referred to as DMD2018). In particular, we show that contrary to the conclusions of DMD2018, the model of Bagheri and Bonadonna (2016, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.06.015), hereafter referred to as BB2016, is the best model in predicting the drag and terminal velocity of particles measured by DMD2018, as demonstrated here by comparison of estimation errors. The discrepancy is mainly due to a production error (misplaced parentheses) introduced in BB2016 during the publication process and partly due to the incorrect methodology used by DMD2018 to calculate particle terminal velocity. Here we present the correct sets of equations and methodology to show that typo-free model of BB2016 outperforms all existing drag models including the new model suggested by DMD2018.
机译:有了这条评论,我们希望澄清最近发表的纸张的许多方面由Dioguardi,Mele和Dellino“的新的单一方程模型,用于不规则形状的颗粒在广泛的雷诺数上有效”(以下提及作为DMD2018)。特别是,我们表明,与DMD2018的结论相反,Bagheri和Bonadonna的模型(2016年,https://doi.org/ 10.1016 / J.Powtec.2016.06.015),此后称为BB2016,是最好的通过比较估计误差来预测DMD2018测量的粒子的阻力和终端速度的模型。差异主要是由于BB2016中引入的生产误差(错位括号),并且部分原因是DMD2018使用的不正确的方法来计算粒子终端速度。在这里,我们呈现了正确的方程和方法集,以表明BB2016的无类型模型优于所有现有的阻力模型,包括DMD2018所建议的新模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号