首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Human Evolution >Technological variation in the earliest Oldowan from Gona, Afar, Ethiopia
【24h】

Technological variation in the earliest Oldowan from Gona, Afar, Ethiopia

机译:来自埃塞俄比亚的GONA最早的最早的Oldowan的技术变异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Inter-site technological variation in the archaeological record is one of the richest potential sources of information about Plio-Pleistocene hominid behavior and evolution. However, appropriate methods for describing and comparing Oldowan assemblages have yet to be agreed upon, and interpretation of the early record remains highly controversial. Particularly salient is disagreement over whether the Oldowan is a single technological phenomenon or is more accurately divided into multiple regional and/or chronological traditions, perhaps including a less developed Pre-Oldowan phase in the late Pliocene. Some of this disagreement reflects theoretical and methodological differences between research traditions and some is more directly evidential. Here we present a framework for describing and interpreting Oldowan variation and apply it to three Pliocene assemblages (EG-10, EG-12, and OGS-7) from Gona, all dated to c. 2.6 million years (Ma). Results indicate proficient knapping and a full range of Oldowan reduction strategies in these earliest known occurrences, consistent with the idea of an Oldowan " technological stasis" from 2.6-1.6. Ma. Patterns of variation in raw material selection and predominant reduction strategy at each site clearly indicate the importance of cultural transmission in the Oldowan, but confounding ecological and economic variation continue to render interpretation in terms of multiple tool making traditions or species inappropriate. We propose that cultural transmission and ecological adaptation should be recognized as complementary, rather than mutually exclusive, mechanisms in future attempts to explain Oldowan technological variation.
机译:考古记录的现场技术变化是有关Plio-epleistocene和进化的最富有的潜在信息来源之一。但是,尚未达成何种适当的描述和比较Oldowan集会的方法,并且对早期记录的解释仍然具有矛盾的态度。特别突出者是分歧,无论是单一的技术现象,还是更准确地分为多个区域和/或时间的传统,也许包括在后期全茂的较少的allowowan阶段。其中一些分歧反映了研究传统之间的理论和方法论差异,有些是更直接的。在这里,我们提出了一种用于描述和解释Oldowan变化的框架,并将其从GONA施加到三个专利组件(例如-10,EG-12和OGS-7),所有这些都将其日期为C. 2.6万年(MA)。结果表明,在这些最早的已知事件中,熟练的恐惧和全系列的Ollowan减少策略,与从2.6-1.6的Oldowan“技术遗传”的想法一致。嘛。每个网站的原材料选择和主要减少策略的变异模式明确表明了奥德瓦尔文化传播的重要性,但混淆生态和经济变化继续在多种工具制造传统或物种不合适的方面进行解释。我们建议将未来试图解释Oldowan技术变异的互补,而不是相互排斥的文化传播和生态适应,而不是相互排斥的机制。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Human Evolution》 |2010年第6期|共18页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Anthropology Emory University 1557 Dickey Drive Atlanta GA 30322 United States;

    The Stone Age Institute 1392 West Dittemore Road Gosport IN 47433 United States;

    Department of Anthropology Southern Connecticut State University 501 Crescent Street New Haven CT 06515-1355 United States;

    Laboratoire départemental de préhistoire du Lazaret USM 204 du Dépt. de préhistoire du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle UMR 5198 du CNRS 33 bis Boulevard Franck-Pilatte 06300 Nice France;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 人类学;
  • 关键词

    Cha?ne opératoire; Early Stone Age; Lithic technology; Pre-Oldowan;

    机译:Cha?NeOpératoire;早期的石器时代;岩石技术;前奥德威;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 09:23:34

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号