首页> 外文期刊>Journal of health care for the poor and underserved >Individual Perspectives of Majority/Minority Partnerships: Who Really Benefits and How?
【24h】

Individual Perspectives of Majority/Minority Partnerships: Who Really Benefits and How?

机译:多数/少数伙伴关系的个人观点:谁真正的福利以及如何?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study ascertained historically Black colleges and universities (HBCU) academic leaders' perceptions of equity between HBCU and predominantly White institutions (PWI) health professions school partnerships related to resource capacity, sustainability and scholarship. A focus group was conducted with seven HBCU health professions schools. A survey was sent to their PWI (n=14) partners. Four themes including positive and negative experiences, challenges, and recommendations to continue relationships with the PWIs were identified. Dissemination of the survey to PWIs resulted in no responses. Benefits of the partnerships include increased HBCU publications and PWI efforts to embrace HBCU students. Inequities in the distribution of social resources and of social justice include the fickle nature of partnership, little interest among PWIs in promoting HBCU expansion and independence, a lack of transparency and clarity in communications, and PWI claims of ownership for ideas proposed by the HBCU. Dual institutional appointments were also identified as problematic.
机译:本研究确定了历史上的黑人高校(HBCU)学术领导人对HBCU之间的股权的看法,主要是白色机构(PWI)卫生专业与资源能力,可持续性和奖学金相关的学校伙伴关系。焦点小组是用七个HBCU健康专业学校进行的。将调查发送到他们的PWI(n = 14)合作伙伴。确定了四个主题,包括积极和消极经验,挑战和建议,以继续与PWIS继续关系。向PWIS传播调查导致了没有回应。合作伙伴关系的好处包括增加了HBCU出版物和PWI努力接受HBCU学生的努力。社会资源分配和社会正义的不公平包括伙伴关系的善良性质,在促进HBCU扩张和独立方面,缺乏通信缺乏透明度和清晰度的兴趣,以及HBCU提出的思想的宣传索赔。双重机构任命也被认为是有问题的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号