...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of forensic sciences. >Adapting the Chumbley Score to Match Striae on Land Engraved Areas ( LEA LEA s) of Bullets ,
【24h】

Adapting the Chumbley Score to Match Striae on Land Engraved Areas ( LEA LEA s) of Bullets ,

机译:调整糖果的分数与子弹的土地雕刻区域(Lea Lea)相匹配。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract The same‐source problem remains a major challenge in forensic toolmark and firearm examination. Here, we investigate the applicability of the Chumbley method (J Forensic Sci, 2018, 63, 849; J Forensic Sci, 2010, 55, 953) (10,12), developed for screwdriver markings, for same‐source identification of striations on bullet LEA s. The Hamby datasets 44 and 252 measured by NIST and CSAFE (high‐resolution scans) are used here. We provide methods to identify parameters that minimize error rates for matching of LEA s, and a remedial algorithm to alleviate the problem of failed tests, while increasing the power of the test and reducing error rates. For 85,491 land‐to‐land comparisons (84,235 known nonmatches and 1256 known matches), the adapted test does not provide a result in 176 situations (originally more than 500). The Type I and Type II error rates are 7.2% (6105 out of 84,235) and 21.4% (271 out of 1256), respectively. This puts the proposed method on similar footing as other single‐feature matching approaches in the literature.
机译:摘要同样的源问题仍然是法医工具标志和枪械检查中的主要挑战。在这里,我们调查了黄蛋白方法的适用性(J法医SCI,2018,63,849; J法制士SCI,2010,55,953)(10,12),为螺丝刀标记开发,同时源识别条纹子弹lea s。这里使用由NIST和CSAFE(高分辨率扫描)测量的哈比数据集44和252。我们提供了识别最小化Lea S匹配的误差率的参数的方法,以及减轻试验失败问题的补救算法,同时增加了测试的功率和降低错误率。对于85,491陆地比较(84,235名未知的非拖匹和1256名已知匹配),适应性测试不提供176个情况(最初超过500)的结果。 I型和II型错误率分别为7.2%(84,235分,分别为84,235),分别为21.4%(1256分)。这使得提出的方法与文献中的其他单一特征匹配方法相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号