...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice >Patients waiting for a hip or knee joint replacement: is there any prioritization for surgery?
【24h】

Patients waiting for a hip or knee joint replacement: is there any prioritization for surgery?

机译:等待髋关节或膝关节置换的患者:手术有任何优先级吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether patients are prioritized for joint replacement surgery on the basis of severity of osteoarthritis, pain and physical functioning. METHOD: A total of 105 patients on the waiting list for primary total knee or hip replacement from a UK regional orthopaedic centre were interviewed at baseline and followed up at 3, 6 and 9 months or until joint replacement. Measurement tools were the visual analogue scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index and the Oxford hip or knee score. RESULTS: Most participants (81, 77%) were categorized on the waiting list as 'routine', despite having high levels of pain according to the measurement scales. There was no significant correlation between the waiting list categorization and the actual waiting time for a hip or knee joint replacement operation (Kendall's tau = 0.17; P = 0.062) and the waiting list categorization did not appear to ensure that patients were operated upon earlier. There were also nosignificant differences in measures (VAS pain, WOMAC and Oxford hip or knee scores) between those individuals who had their operations earlier (before 6 months) compared with those participants who had their operations later (6 months or greater) or even not at all. Of the 105 patients who were listed for joint replacement, 24 (25%) patients did not have their operation due to: a medical delay (14); self-delay/cancellation (7); arthroscopy instead (2); and death (1). CONCLUSION: With the expected increase in demand for joint replacement, there needs to be a re-examination of assessment procedures of patients listed for joint replacement. The use of measurement tools to assess symptoms such as pain and physical function would be one way forward.
机译:目的:探讨患者是否在骨关节炎的严重程度,疼痛和身体运作的基础上优先考虑联合替代手术。方法:在基线采访了英国区域矫形中心的初级总膝盖或髋关节替换等待列表中的105名患者,并在3,6和9个月内完成,直到联合替代。测量工具是视觉模拟量表(VAS),西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学(Womac)骨关节炎指数和牛津臀部或膝关节分数。结果:尽管根据测量尺度,但大多数参与者(81,77%)将在等候名单上分类为“常规”,尽管疼痛较高。等候名单分类与髋关节或膝关节置换操作的实际等待时间之间没有显着相关性(KENDALL的TAU = 0.17; P = 0.062),等待名单分类并未似乎确保患者在更早的情况下运行。在与在稍后(6个月或更高6个月)的参与者相比,这些人之间的措施(VAS疼痛,Womac和牛津臀部或膝关节或膝关节)之间也存在无顽皮差异差异根本在列出联合替代的105名患者中,24例(25%)患者由于:医疗延迟(14);自动延迟/取消(7);关节镜检查(2);和死亡(1)。结论:随着联合替代的需求需求增加,需要重新审查所列关节替代的患者的评估程序。使用测量工具以评估疼痛和物理功能等症状将是一种前进的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号