首页> 外文期刊>Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition >A Stimulus-Location Effect in Contingency-Governed, but Not Rule-Based, Discrimination Learning
【24h】

A Stimulus-Location Effect in Contingency-Governed, but Not Rule-Based, Discrimination Learning

机译:刺激定位在应急管理中的效果,但不是基于规则的歧视学习

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We tested pigeons' acquisition of a conditional discrimination task between colored grating stimuli that included choosing 1 of 2 response keys, which either appeared as white keys to the left and right of the discriminative stimulus, or were replicas of the stimulus. Pigeons failed to acquire the discrimination when the response keys were white disks but succeeded when directly responding to a replica of the stimulus. These results highlight how conditioning processes shape learning in pigeons: The results can be accounted for by supposing that, when pigeons were allowed to respond directly toward the stimulus, learning was guided by classical conditioning, but that responding to white keys demanded instrumental learning, which impaired task acquisition for pigeons. In contrast, humans completing the same paradigm showed no differential learning success depending on whether figure or position indicated the correct key. However, only participants who could state the underlying discrimination rule acquired the task, which implies that human performance in this situation relied on the deduction and application of task rules instead of associative processes.
机译:我们测试了鸽子获取有色光栅刺激之间的条件辨别任务,其中包括选择2个响应键的1个,它们既显示为鉴别刺激左侧和右侧的白色键,或者是刺激的复制品。当响应键是白色磁盘时,鸽子未能获得歧视,但是在直接响应刺激的复制品时成功。这些结果突出了调节过程如何在鸽子中进行形状学习:通过假设鸽子直接响应刺激的结果,可以考虑到结果,通过古典调理引导学习,但是响应白色钥匙要求乐器学习鸽子的任务收购受损。相比之下,完成相同范式的人类显示没有差异学习成功,具体取决于图形或位置是否指示正确的键。但是,只有能够说明潜在的歧视规则的参与者就收购了这项任务,这意味着在这种情况下的人类表现依赖于扣除和申请任务规则而不是联想进程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号