...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Electrocardiology: An International Publication for the Study of the Electrical Activities of the Heart >New ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction criteria for left bundle branch block based on QRS area
【24h】

New ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction criteria for left bundle branch block based on QRS area

机译:基于QRS区域的左束分支块的新的ST段抬高心肌梗死标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background ECG detection of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the presence of left bundle-branch block (LBBB) is challenging due to ST deviation from the altered conduction. The purpose of this study was to introduce a new algorithm for STEMI detection in LBBB and compare the performance to three existing algorithms. Methods Source data of the study group (143 with acute MI and 239 controls) comes from multiple sources. ECGs were selected by computer interpretation of LBBB. Acute MI reference was hospital discharge diagnosis. Automated measurements came from the Philips DXL algorithm. Three existing algorithms were compared, (1) Sgarbossa criteria, (2) Selvester 10% RS criteria and (3) Smith 25% S-wave criteria. The new algorithm uses an ST threshold based on QRS area. All algorithms share the concordant ST elevation and anterior ST depression criteria from the Sgarbossa score. The difference is in the threshold for discordant ST elevation. The Sgarbossa, Selvester, Smith and Philips discordant ST elevation criteria are (1) ST elevation ≥ 500 μV, (2) ST elevation ≥ 10% of |S|-|R| plus STEMI limits, (3) ST elevation ≥ 25% of the S-wave amplitude and (4) ST elevation ≥ 100 μV + 1050 μV/Ash* QRS area. The Smith S-wave and Philips QRS area criteria were tested using both a single and 2 lead requirement. Algorithm performance was measured by sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratio (LR +). Results Algorithm performance can be organized in bands of similar sensitivity and specificity ranging from Sgarbossa score ≥ 3 with the lowest sensitivity and highest specificity, 13.3% and 97.9%, to the Selvester 10% rule with the highest sensitivity and lower specificity of 30.1% and 93.2%. The Smith S-wave and Philips QRS area algorithms were in the middle band with sensitivity and specificity of (20.3%, 94.9%) and (23.8%, 95.8%) respectively. Conclusion As can be seen from the difference between Sgarbossa score ≥ 3 and other algorithms for STEMI in LBBB, a discordant ST elevation criterion improves the sensitivity for detection but also results in a drop in specificity. For applications of automated STEMI detection that require higher sensitivity, the Selvester algorithm is better. For applications that require a low false positive rate such as relying on the algorithm for pre-hospital activation of cardiac catheterization laboratory for urgent PCI, it may be better to use the 2 lead Philips QRS area or Smith 25% S-wave algorithm.
机译:背景技术由于ST偏离导通的ST偏差,ST段抬高心肌梗死(LBBB)的心肌梗死(STEMI)的ECG检测是挑战。本研究的目的是在LBBB中引入一种新的Stemi检测算法,并将性能与三个现有算法进行比较。方法研究组的源数据(143带急性MI和239个控制)来自多种来源。通过电脑解释LBBB选择ECG。急性MI参考是医院放电诊断。自动测量来自飞利浦DXL算法。比较了三种现有算法,(1)SGASBOSSA标准,(2)硒鼓10%RS标准和(3)史密斯25%S波标准。新算法使用基于QRS区域的ST阈值。所有算法都与SGASBOSSA得分共享一致的ST高程和前St抑郁标准。差异在于不和谐ST升高的阈值。 SGESASA,SERVESTER,SMITH和飞利浦不和谐ST海拔标准是(1)ST升级≥500μV,(2)ST海拔≥10%| S | - | R |加上STEMI限制,(3)S ST升高≥25%的S波幅度和(4)ST升高≥100μV+1050μV/灰分* QRS区域。使用单一和2个铅需求测试史密斯S波和飞利浦QRS区域标准。通过灵敏度,特异性和正似然比(LR +)测量算法性能。结果算法性能可以在类似敏感性和特异性的频段中组织,从SGASBOSSA得分≥3的敏感度和最高特异性,13.3%和97.9%,塞维斯特10%的规则具有最高的敏感性和30.1%的特异性93.2%。史密斯S波和飞利浦QRS区域算法分别位于中间带中,分别具有(20.3%,94.9%)和(23.8%,95.8%)的敏感性和特异性。结论从SGASBOSSA得分≥3和其他算法之间的差异可以看出,DIPI在LBBB中的其他算法,不和谐的ST升降标准改善了检测的灵敏度,但也导致特异性下降。对于需要更高灵敏度的自动化STEMI检测的应用,SELVESTER算法更好。对于需要低假阳性率的应用,例如依赖于前院前心电图实验室的前医院激活算法进行紧急PCI,可以更好地使用2个铅飞利浦QRS区域或史密斯25%S波算法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号