首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Electrocardiology: An International Publication for the Study of the Electrical Activities of the Heart >New ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction criteria for left bundle branch block based on QRS area
【24h】

New ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction criteria for left bundle branch block based on QRS area

机译:基于QRS面积的左束支传导阻滞的新ST段抬高型心肌梗死标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background ECG detection of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the presence of left bundle-branch block (LBBB) is challenging due to ST deviation from the altered conduction. The purpose of this study was to introduce a new algorithm for STEMI detection in LBBB and compare the performance to three existing algorithms. Methods Source data of the study group (143 with acute MI and 239 controls) comes from multiple sources. ECGs were selected by computer interpretation of LBBB. Acute MI reference was hospital discharge diagnosis. Automated measurements came from the Philips DXL algorithm. Three existing algorithms were compared, (1) Sgarbossa criteria, (2) Selvester 10% RS criteria and (3) Smith 25% S-wave criteria. The new algorithm uses an ST threshold based on QRS area. All algorithms share the concordant ST elevation and anterior ST depression criteria from the Sgarbossa score. The difference is in the threshold for discordant ST elevation. The Sgarbossa, Selvester, Smith and Philips discordant ST elevation criteria are (1) ST elevation ≥ 500 μV, (2) ST elevation ≥ 10% of |S|-|R| plus STEMI limits, (3) ST elevation ≥ 25% of the S-wave amplitude and (4) ST elevation ≥ 100 μV + 1050 μV/Ash* QRS area. The Smith S-wave and Philips QRS area criteria were tested using both a single and 2 lead requirement. Algorithm performance was measured by sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratio (LR +). Results Algorithm performance can be organized in bands of similar sensitivity and specificity ranging from Sgarbossa score ≥ 3 with the lowest sensitivity and highest specificity, 13.3% and 97.9%, to the Selvester 10% rule with the highest sensitivity and lower specificity of 30.1% and 93.2%. The Smith S-wave and Philips QRS area algorithms were in the middle band with sensitivity and specificity of (20.3%, 94.9%) and (23.8%, 95.8%) respectively. Conclusion As can be seen from the difference between Sgarbossa score ≥ 3 and other algorithms for STEMI in LBBB, a discordant ST elevation criterion improves the sensitivity for detection but also results in a drop in specificity. For applications of automated STEMI detection that require higher sensitivity, the Selvester algorithm is better. For applications that require a low false positive rate such as relying on the algorithm for pre-hospital activation of cardiac catheterization laboratory for urgent PCI, it may be better to use the 2 lead Philips QRS area or Smith 25% S-wave algorithm.
机译:由于ST偏离传导改变,因此在左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)存在的情况下,对ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的背景ECG检测具有挑战性。这项研究的目的是介绍一种用于LBBB中STEMI检测的新算法,并将其性能与三种现有算法进行比较。方法研究组(143例急性心肌梗死和239例对照)的来源数据来自多个来源。心电图通过LBBB的计算机解释选择。急性心肌梗死参考是出院诊断。自动测量来自Philips DXL算法。比较了三种现有算法:(1)Sgarbossa标准,(2)Selvester 10%RS标准和(3)Smith 25%S-wave标准。新算法使用基于QRS面积的ST阈值。所有算法均根据Sgarbossa评分共享一致的ST抬高和前ST抑郁标准。差异在于不一致的ST高程的阈值。 Sgarbossa,Selvester,Smith和Philips不一致的ST升高标准为(1)ST升高≥500μV,(2)ST升高≥| S |-| R |的10%加上STEMI限制,(3)ST仰角≥S波幅值的25%,以及(4)ST仰角≥100μV+ 1050μV/ Ash * QRS面积。史密斯S波和飞利浦QRS区域标准均使用单根和两根铅测试。通过敏感性,特异性和正似然比(LR +)来衡量算法性能。结果可以在相似敏感性和特异性的条带中组织算法性能,范围从具有最低敏感性和最高特异性的Sgarbossa得分≥3(分别为13.3%和97.9%)到具有最高敏感性和较低特异性的Selvester 10%规则(分别为30.1%和93.2%。 Smith S-wave和飞利浦QRS面积算法位于中间带,灵敏度和特异性分别为(20.3%,94.9%)和(23.8%,95.8%)。结论从Sgarbossa得分≥3与其他LBBB STEMI算法之间的差异可以看出,不一致的ST升高标准可提高检测灵敏度,但也会导致特异性下降。对于需要更高灵敏度的自动STEMI检测应用,Selvester算法更好。对于要求低假阳性率的应用,例如依赖紧急导管的院前激活心脏导管实验室的算法,最好使用2导的Philips QRS区域或Smith 25%S波算法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号