...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of digital imaging: the official journal of the Society for Computer Applications in Radiology >Reduction of False-Positive Markings on Mammograms: a Retrospective Comparison Study Using an Artificial Intelligence-Based CAD
【24h】

Reduction of False-Positive Markings on Mammograms: a Retrospective Comparison Study Using an Artificial Intelligence-Based CAD

机译:减少乳房X线图的假阳性标记:一种使用基于人工智能的CAD的回顾性比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The aim was to determine whether an artificial intelligence (AI)-based, computer-aided detection (CAD) software can be used to reduce false positive per image (FPPI) on mammograms as compared to an FDA-approved conventional CAD. A retrospective study was performed on a set of 250 full-field digital mammograms between January 1, 2013, and March 31, 2013, and the number of marked regions of interest of two different systems was compared for sensitivity and specificity in cancer detection. The count of false-positive marks per image (FPPI) of the two systems was also evaluated as well as the number of cases that were completely mark-free. All results showed statistically significant reductions in false marks with the use of AI-CAD vs CAD (confidence interval=95%) with no reduction in sensitivity. There is an overall 69% reduction in FPPI using the AI-based CAD as compared to CAD, consisting of 83% reduction in FPPI for calcifications and 56% reduction for masses. Almost half (48%) of cases showed no AI-CAD markings while only 17% show no conventional CAD marks. There was a significant reduction in FPPI with AI-CAD as compared to CAD for both masses and calcifications at all tissue densities. A 69% decrease in FPPI could result in a 17% decrease in radiologist reading time per case based on prior literature of CAD reading times. Additionally, decreasing false-positive recalls in screening mammography has many direct social and economic benefits.
机译:目的是确定基于人工智能(AI)的计算机辅助检测(CAD)软件是否可用于在与FDA批准的常规CAD相比,在乳房X光线照片上缩小误报(FPPI)。在2013年1月1日至2013年3月31日至2013年3月31日之间进行了回顾性研究,比较了两种不同系统的标记区域的数量,用于敏感性和癌症检测中的特异性。还评估了两种系统的每张图像(FPPI)的假阳性标记的计数以及完全标记的病例数。所有结果都显示出统计学上的尺寸明显减少,使用AI-CAD VS CAD(置信区间= 95%),没有敏感性。与CAD相比,使用AI基CAD总共有69%的FPPI减少,其中钙化的FPPI减少83%,群体减少56%。几乎一半(48%)的病例显示没有AI-CAD标记,而只有17%的案例显示没有传统的CAD标记。与AI-CAD的FPPI相比,与所有组织密度的肿块和钙化相比,FPPI的FPPI显着减少。根据CAD阅读时间的先前文献,FPPI减少69%的FPPI减少可能导致放射科读取时间减少17%。此外,减少筛选乳房X线摄影中的假阳性召回具有许多直接的社会和经济效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号