首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Dental Research: Official Publication of the International Association for Dental Research >Oral Sciences PhD Program Enrollment, Graduates, and Placement: 1994 to 2016
【24h】

Oral Sciences PhD Program Enrollment, Graduates, and Placement: 1994 to 2016

机译:口语科学博士计划注册,毕业生和安置:1994年至2016年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For decades, dental schools in the United States have endured a significant faculty shortage. Studies have determined that the top 2 sources of dental faculty are advanced education programs and private practice. Those who have completed both DDS and PhD training are considered prime candidates for dental faculty positions. However, there is no national database to track those trainees and no evidence to indicate that they entered academia upon graduation. The objective of this study was to assess outcomes of dental school-affiliated oral sciences PhD program enrollment, graduates, and placement between 1994 and 2016. Using the American Dental Association annual survey of advanced dental education programs not accredited by the Commission on Dental Accreditation and data obtained from 22 oral sciences PhD programs, we assessed student demographics, enrollment, graduation, and placement. Based on the data provided by program directors, the average new enrollment was 33, and graduation was 26 per year. A total of 605 graduated; 39 did not complete; and 168 were still in training. Among those 605 graduates, 211 were faculty in U.S. academic institutions, and 77 were faculty in foreign institutions. Given that vacant budgeted full-time faculty positions averaged 257 per year during this period, graduates from those oral sciences PhD programs who entered academia in the United States would have filled 9 (3.6%) vacant faculty positions per year. Therefore, PhD programs have consistently generated only a small pipeline of dental school faculty. Better mentoring to retain talent in academia is necessary. Stronger support and creative funding plans are essential to sustain the PhD program. Furthermore, the oral sciences PhD program database should be established and maintained by dental professional organizations to allow assessments of training models, trends of enrollment, graduation, and placement outcomes.
机译:几十年来,美国的牙科学校仍然持续了大量的教育短缺。研究已经确定,牙科教师的前两大来源是先进的教育计划和私人惯例。完成DDS和博士培训的人被视为牙科教职员职位的主要候选人。但是,没有国家数据库跟踪这些受训人员,没有证据表明他们在毕业后进入了学术界。本研究的目的是评估1994年至2016年期间牙科学校附属口头科学博士学位博士学位博士博士博士博士博士博士博士,毕业生和安置。利用美国牙科协会的年度调查,牙科认证委员会没有认可的先进牙科教育计划。从22个口语科学博士计划获得的数据,我们评估了学生人口统计,注册,毕业和安置。根据计划董事提供的数据,新的招生平均入学时间为33,毕业为每年26次。共有605级毕业; 39没有完成; 168仍在训练中。在这605名毕业生中,211名是美国学术机构的教师,77个是外国机构的教师。鉴于该期间空置预算的全职教师职位平均每年257次,来自美国进入学术界的博士博士计划的毕业生将填写每年9(3.6%)空置的教师职位。因此,博士计划一直生成一小管道的牙科学院。更好地指导在学术界留住才能。强大的支持和创造性的资助计划对于维持博士计划至关重要。此外,应由牙科专业组织建立和维护口语科学博士计划数据库,以允许评估培训模式,入学趋势,毕业和放置结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号