首页> 外文期刊>Journal of critical care >Respiratory support techniques to avoid desaturation in critically ill patients requiring endotracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Respiratory support techniques to avoid desaturation in critically ill patients requiring endotracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:呼吸支持技术,以避免需要气管插管的危重病患者的去饱和:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Purpose To evaluate which respiratory support method for critically ill patients undergoing endotracheal intubation (ETI) is associated with less desaturation. Methods We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus and CINAHL databases. We included randomized (RCT) and non-randomized (non-RCT) studies investigating any method of respiratory support before/during ETI compared to a reference control. Results Apneic oxygenation (ApOx) was the most commonly investigated respiratory support technique for critically ill patients undergoing intubation (4 RCTs, 358 patients). Three of these studies investigated high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) for ApOx while standard nasal cannula was used in one. Globally, ApOx was associated with higher minimum SpO 2 value compared to those receiving ETI without ApOx (mean difference 2.31%, 95% CI 0.42 to 4.20, p=0.02, I 2 =0%) but there were not significant differences between groups in severe hypoxemia and intubation related – complications. Concerning other techniques, noninvasive ventilation (NIV) was compared to bag-valve mask in only one RCT and it reduced the degree of desaturation. Conclusions ApOx was significantly associated with higher minimum SpO 2 registered during the intubation procedure. Further studies are needed to increase the number of included patients and demonstrate the benefit of ApOx and of other respiratory support methods (e.g. NIV, HFNC). Highlights ? Apneic oxygenation is the most studied respiratory support for critically ill patients undergoing endotracheal intubation ? Apneic oxygenation is associated with a reduced risk of hypoxemia ? Other less studied methods of respiratory support (e.g. noninvasive ventilation) should be better investigated ? Further studies are needed to increase the number of included patients
机译:摘要目的是评估经受接受气管内插管(ETI)的重症病患者的呼吸支持方法与较少的去污染有关。方法搜索PubMed,Cochrane图书馆,Scopus和Cinahl数据库。我们包括随机(RCT)和非随机化(非RCT)研究,研究ETI之前/期间的任何呼吸载体方法与参考控制相比。结果促进氧合(APOX)是患有插管(4个RCT,358名患者)的批判性患者的最常见的呼吸支持技术。这些研究中的三种研究了APOX的高流量鼻腔(HFNC),而标准鼻套套管用于一个。在全球范围内,与没有APOX的接受ETI(平均差2.31%,95%CI 0.42至4.20,P = 0.02,I 2 = 0%),相比,APOX与较高的最小SPO 2值相关联。除了组之间没有显着差异严重的低氧血症和插管相关 - 并发症。关于其他技术,将非侵入性通气(NIV)与袋阀掩模进行比较,只有一个RCT,它降低了去饱和度。结论APOX与插管过程中注册的更高的最小SPO 2显着相关。需要进一步的研究来增加包括患者的数量,并证明APOX和其他呼吸载体方法(例如NIV,HFNC)的益处。强调 ?牛桂氧合是最受治疗的患者的呼吸障碍最受欢迎的病人?促进氧合与低氧血症的风险降低有关?其他较少研究的呼吸支持方法(例如,非侵入性通风)应更好地调查?需要进一步的研究来增加包括患者的数量

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号