首页> 外文期刊>Journal of critical care >Early vs. late tracheostomy in intensive care settings: Impact on ICU and hospital costs
【24h】

Early vs. late tracheostomy in intensive care settings: Impact on ICU and hospital costs

机译:早期与晚期气管造口术,重症监护环境:对ICU和医院费用的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

IntroductionUp to 12% of the 800,000 patients who undergo mechanical ventilation in the United States every year require tracheostomies. A recent systematic review showed that early tracheostomy was associated with better outcomes: more ventilator-free days, shorter ICU stays, less sedation and reduced long-term mortality. However, the financial impact of early tracheostomies remain unknown. ObjectivesTo conduct a cost-analysis on the timing of tracheostomy in mechanically ventilated patients. MethodsWe extracted individual length of hospital stay and length of ICU stay data from the studies included in the systematic review from Hosokawa et al. We also searched for any recent randomized control trials on the topic that were published after this review. The weighted length of stay was estimated using a random effects model. Average daily hospital and ICU costs per patients were obtained from a cost study by Kahn et al. We estimated hospital and ICU costs by multiplying LOS with respective average daily cost per patient. We calculated difference in costs by subtracting hospital costs, ICU costs and total direct variable costs from early tracheotomy to late tracheotomy. 95% confidence intervals were estimated using bootstrap re-sampling procedures with 1000 iterations. ResultsThe average weighted cost of ICU stay in patients with an early tracheostomy was $4316 less when compared to patients with late tracheostomy (95% CI: 403–8229). Subgroup analysis revealed that very early tracheostomies ( 4) cost on average $6385 USD less than late tracheostomies (95% CI: –4396–17,165). ConclusionThis study shows that early tracheostomy can significantly reduce direct variable and likely total hospital costs in the intensive care unit based on length of stay alone. This is in addition to the already shown benefits of early tracheostomy in terms of ventilator dependent days, reduced length of stays, decreased pain, and improved communication. Further prospective studies on this topic are needed to prove the cost-effectiveness of early tracheostomy in the critically ill population.
机译:每年介绍80,000名接受美国机械通风的患者的12%需要气管造称。最近的系统综述表明,早期的气管造口术与更好的结果有关:不含呼吸机的天,较短的ICU保持,镇静和减少长期死亡率。然而,早期气管造称的财务影响仍然是未知的。 Objectivesto对机械通风患者中的气管造口术定期进行成本分析。方法网络提取的个人住院时间长度和ICU的长度从Hosokawa等人的系统审查中的研究中保持数据。我们还搜索了最近在本次审查后发布的主题的任何随机控制试验。使用随机效果模型估计加权保持长度。每位患者的平均每日医院和ICU成本是由Kahn等人的成本研究获得的。我们通过将洛杉矶分别乘以每位患者平均每日成本的洛杉矶估计医院和ICU成本。通过减去医院成本,ICU成本和晚期气管切开术治疗后期的成本计算成本差异。使用1000次迭代的引导重新采样程序估计95%的置信区间。与晚期气管造口术(95%CI:403-8229)相比,患有早期气管造福术的ICU患者的ICU的平均加权成本少4316美元(95%CI:403-8229)。亚组分析显示,严重的气管遗言(4)平均成本平均低于晚期气管遗工(95%CI:-4396-17,165)。结论本研究表明,早期的气管造口术可以显着减少直接变量,并基于单独的住宿时间来显着减少强化护理单位的医院总成本。除了在呼吸机依赖日期的早期气管造口术的已经显示的益处之外,减少的住宿时间减少,疼痛减少和改善的沟通。需要对这一主题的进一步预期研究是为了证明早期气管造影术中的成本效益在危重人口中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号