首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Immunology >Prescribing Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy for Patients with Non-classical and Secondary Antibody Deficiency: an Analysis of the Practice of Clinical Immunologists in the UK and Republic of Ireland
【24h】

Prescribing Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy for Patients with Non-classical and Secondary Antibody Deficiency: an Analysis of the Practice of Clinical Immunologists in the UK and Republic of Ireland

机译:规定非古典和次生抗体缺陷患者的免疫球蛋白替代疗法:英国和爱尔兰共和国临床免疫学家实践分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Immunologists are increasingly being asked to assess patients with non-classical and secondary antibody deficiency to determine their potential need for immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IGRT). Immunoglobulin is a limited, expensive resource and no clear guidance exists for this broad patient group. The purpose of this survey is to establish what factors influence the decision to commence IGRT in adult patients, when diagnostic criteria for primary antibody deficiency are not fulfilled. Methods Under the auspices of the United Kingdom Primary Immunodeficiency Network (UKPIN), a study group was established which circulated an online questionnaire to the consultant body across the UK and Ireland. Results provided a snapshot of the current clinical practice of 71% of consultant immunologists, from 30 centers. Results In order of importance, factors which influence the decision to commence IGRT include number of hospital admissions with infection, serum IgG level, bronchiectasis, radiologically proven pneumonia, number of positive sputum cultures, number of antibiotic courses, and results of immunization studies. The commonest test vaccine used was Pneumovax 23 with measurement of serotype-specific responses at 4?weeks, with a threshold of 0.35?μg/ml in 2/3 of serotypes measured. Eighty-six percent of patients are treated with a trial of prophylactic antibiotics prior to consideration of IGRT. Efficacy of IGRT trial is assessed at between 6 and 12?months. Conclusions There was consistency in clinical practice using a combination of clinical history, evidence of infections, and vaccination testing for diagnosis. However, there was some variation in the implementation of this practice, particularly in vaccine choice and assessment of response to vaccination.
机译:摘要背景,越来越多地被要求评估非古典和次生抗体缺乏患者以确定其对免疫球蛋白替代治疗(IGRT)的潜在需求。免疫球蛋白是具有有限的,昂贵的资源,并且对于该宽患者组不存在明确的指导。本调查的目的是建立影响成人患者在成年患者中的决定的因素,当时没有满足原发性抗体缺乏的诊断标准。在英国主要免疫租借网络(Ukpin)的主持下,建立了一项研究小组,将在英国和爱尔兰的顾问机构分发在线问卷。结果提供了30个顾问免疫医生的当前临床实践的快照。结果至关重要的顺序,影响令人难以预测IGRT的因素包括感染,血清IgG水平,支气管扩张,放射学验证的肺炎,抗生素培养数,抗生素课程数量以及免疫研究结果的数量。使用的最常见的测试疫苗是肺炎群23,测量血清型响应的4?周,在测量的2/3中阈值为0.35Ωμg/ ml。在考虑IGRT之前,通过试验预防性抗生素治疗八十六个患者。 IGRT试验的疗效在6到12月之间进行评估?数月。结论使用临床历史,感染证据和诊断疫苗接种检测的组合,临床实践中存在一致性。然而,这种做法的实施中存在一些变化,特别是在疫苗选择和对疫苗接种的评估中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号