...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical anesthesia >The correlation of the depth of anesthesia and postoperative cognitive impairment: A meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
【24h】

The correlation of the depth of anesthesia and postoperative cognitive impairment: A meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

机译:麻醉深度和术后认知障碍的相关性:基于随机对照试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Study objective and backgroundTo comprehensively evaluate the associations between the depth of anesthesia and postoperative delirium (POD) or postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). DesignUsing the Cochrane evaluation system, the included studies were conducted with quality assessment. Data sourcesWe searched Cochrane library, Embase and PubMed databases without language restriction. The retrieval time is up to August 2017. Eligibility criteriaAccording to the PRISMA guideline, the results associated with POCD and POD separately were compared between low and high bispectral index (BIS) groups under fixed effects model or random effects model. Besides, the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were utilized as the effect sizes for merging the results. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the stability of the results. Using Egger's test, publication bias was assessed for the included studies. ResultsTotally, 4 studies with high qualities were selected for this meta-analysis. The merged results of POCD showed no significant difference between low and high BIS groups (RR (95% CI)=0.84 (0.21, 3.45), P>0.05). Sensitivity analysis showed that the merged results of POCD were not stable (RR (95%CI)=0.41 (0.17, 0.99)–1.88 (1.09, 3.22), P=0.046). Additionally, no significant publication bias for POCD was found (P=0.385). ConclusionThere was no significant correlation between the depth of anesthesia and POCD.
机译:研究目标和背景全面评估麻醉和术后谵妄(POD)或术后认知功能障碍(POCD)之间的关联。指定Cochrane评估系统,包括质量评估所包含的研究。数据SourcesWe搜索Cochrane库,Embase和PubMed数据库而无需语言限制。检索时间达2017年8月。资格标准对PRISMA指南,在固定效果模型或随机效应模型下的低双光谱指数(BIS)组之间比较了与POCD和POD相关的结果。此外,风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(95%CIs)用作合并结果的效果大小。此外,进行敏感性分析以评估结果的稳定性。使用Egger的测试,为包括的研究评估出版物偏见。结果表明,选择具有高质量的4项,用于该荟萃分析。 POCD的合并结果显示低双基团(RR(95%CI)= 0.84(0.21,3.45),P> 0.05)之间没有显着差异。敏感性分析表明,POCD的合并结果不稳定(RR(95%CI)= 0.41(0.17,0.99)-1.88(1.09,3.22),P = 0.046)。另外,未发现POCD的显着出版物偏差(P = 0.385)。结论麻醉和POCD的深度之间没有显着相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号