首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical gastroenterology >Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration (BRTO) Versus Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) for Treatment of Gastric Varices Because of Portal Hypertension A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration (BRTO) Versus Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) for Treatment of Gastric Varices Because of Portal Hypertension A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:气球 - 闭塞逆行逐字手术泄露(BRTO)与喉肝内存系统分流器(提示)用于治疗胃部,因为门静脉高血压是系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Although gastric variceal (GV) bleeding is less common than esophageal variceal bleeding, the severity of GV bleeding is often greater with higher morbidity and mortality rates. Minimally invasive endovascular treatments such as balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) have been used for the management of GVs with varying results, and individual and institutional differences exist in the use of BRTO and TIPS. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of BRTO and TIPS for the treatment of GVs because of portal hypertension. Methods: Searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases were performed from inception through March 2019. Summary odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was estimated for technical success, hemostasis rate, postprocedural complications, rebleeding rate, incidence of hepatic encephalopathy, and mortality rate at 1 year utilizing a random-effects model. Results: Seven studies with a total of 676 patients (BRTO: 462 and TIPS: 214) were included. There was no difference in pooled technical success rate (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.28-2.73;P=0.81), hemostasis rate (OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 0.61-12.26;P=0.19), and postoperative procedure-related complications (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 0.44-8.72;P=0.38). However, treatment with BRTO was associated with lower rates of postoperative rebleeding (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.18-0.48;P<0.00001), postoperative encephalopathy (OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.02-0.15;P < 0.00001), and mortality at 1 year (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.21-0.87;P=0.02). Conclusions: BRTO was associated with lower rates of rebleeding, postprocedure hepatic encephalopathy, and mortality at 1 year. BRTO should be considered first-line modality for the treatment of GVs because of portal hypertension.
机译:背景:虽然胃部静脉曲张(GV)出血不太常见,但是GV出血的严重程度往往具有较高的发病率和死亡率。最微创血管内处理,例如球囊闭塞逆行吞咽灭错(BRO)和Transjugular肝内portoSystemic分流器(提示)已被用于具有不同结果的GVS的管理,并且在使用BRTO和提示中存在个人和制度差异。我们进行了系统审查和荟萃分析,以比较BRO的可行性,疗效和安全性和由于门静脉高血压而治疗GV的技巧。方法:从2019年3月开始搜索PubMed,Embase,Google Scholar和Cochrane Library数据库。概述了95%置信区间(CI)的概要赔率比(CI)估计技术成功,止血率,后性并发症,reblededing利用随机效应模型,肝脑病的率,肝脑病发病,以及1年的死亡率。结果:共有七项研究,共有676名患者(BRTO:462和TIPS:214)。汇总的技术成功率(或0.87; 95%CI,0.28-2.73; p = 0.81),止血率(或2.74; 95%CI,0.61-12.26; p = 0.19)和术后程序的差异 - 相关的并发症(或1.95; 95%CI,0.44-8.72; p = 0.38)。然而,用BRTO的处理与术后再释放的较低率(或0.30; 95%CI,0.18-0.48; P <0.00001),术后脑病(或0.06; 95%CI,0.02-0.15; P <0.00001) ,1年的死亡率(或0.43; 95%CI,0.21-0.87; p = 0.02)。结论:BRTO与较低的Rebleeding,后期肝脏脑病和1年死亡率相关。由于门静脉高血压,BRTO应该被视为治疗GV的一线方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号