首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical gastroenterology >Variations in Insurance Policies Regarding Adherence to the AGA Guideline for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in IBD
【24h】

Variations in Insurance Policies Regarding Adherence to the AGA Guideline for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in IBD

机译:关于遵守IBD治疗药物监测AGA指南的保险政策的变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) published guidelines on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in August 2017 recommending use of reactive TDM to guide treatment changes in patients with active IBD who are being treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents or thiopurines. We sought to determine if changes in national clinical practice guidelines result in changes in health care insurance policies within 6 months of publication. Methods: Using the National Association of Insurance Commissioners Market Share Reports of the top 125 insurance companies by market share in 2016, we reviewed the largest 50 companies for their publicly available online policies regarding TDM of anti-TNF and thiopurine in IBD. For those with available policies, we looked for whether proactive and/or reactive TDM was covered. Policies were also looked for genetic or enzymatic activity of thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) testing before use of thiopurine. All these policies were reviewed within the week of publication of the AGA guideline. They were reviewed again 1, 3, and 6 months later for evaluation of any policy changes after the published AGA guidelines. Results: Fifty of the largest insurance company policies were included. With regards to TDM policy for anti-TNF, we did not find a difference between baseline and 6 months values (P=0.38). With regards to TDM policy for thiopurine, we did not find a difference between baseline and 6 months values (P=1.00). About half of the companies did not have a policy regarding TPMT testing for thiopurine use. Of those with available policies for TPMT testing, there was no difference between baseline and 6 months values (P=0.13). Conclusions: Even after publication of national guidelines, a large number of the largest health insurance companies do not have a policy regarding reactive TDM for anti-TNF and/or thiopurines. Majority of those with a policy, fail to meet the current standards set forth by the practice guidelines. A significant gap remains between the insurance policies and AGA guidelines. Further studies are needed to determine how to effectuate change to improve insurance company adherence to clinical practice guidelines.
机译:背景:美国胃肠学协会(AGA)于2017年8月推荐使用反应性TDM在炎症性肠病(IBD)的治疗药物监测(IBD)的指导方针发表了对抗​​肿瘤治疗的活性IBD患者的治疗变化坏死因子(抗TNF)药物或硫嘌呤。我们试图确定国家临床实践指南的变化是否导致出版物的6个月内卫生保险政策的变化。方法:采用全国保险专员协会,2016年市场份额中排名前125名保险公司的报告,我们审查了最大的50家公司,以获得有关IBD中的抗TNF和Thiopurine的TDM的公开在线政策。对于那些有可用政策的人,我们寻找主动和/或反应性TDM。在使用前,还寻找硫嘌呤甲基转移酶(TPMT)测试的遗传或酶活性的政策。所有这些政策都在AGA指南的出版周内进行了审查。他们再次审查1,3和6个月后,以便在公布的AGA准则后评估任何政策变更。结果:包括最大保险公司政策的五十份。关于抗TNF的TDM政策,我们没有发现基线和6个月的值之间的差异(P = 0.38)。关于TDM治疗Thiopurine的政策,我们没有在基线和6个月之间找到差异(P = 1.00)。大约一半的公司没有关于TPMT测试的硫嘌呤使用的政策。在具有TPMT测试的可用政策的人中,基线和6个月之间没有区别(P = 0.13)。结论:即使在出版国家准则后,大量最大的健康保险公司也没有关于抗TNF和/或硫嘌呤的反应性TDM的政策。具有政策的大多数人,未能达到实践指南所规定的当前标准。保险政策和AGA指南之间存在重大差距。需要进一步的研究来确定如何影响改善保险公司遵守临床实践指南的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号