...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology >Brief Mindfulness Training for Negative Affectivity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Brief Mindfulness Training for Negative Affectivity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:对消极情感的简要训练:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: Over the last 10 years, there has been a dramatic increase in published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of brief mindfulness training (from single-session inductions to multisession interventions lasting up to 2 weeks), with some preliminary indications that these training programs may improve mental health outcomes, such as negative affectivity. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether brief mindfulness training reliably reduces negative affectivity. Method: PubMed, PsycINFO, and the Mind-fulness Research Monthly Newsletter were systematically searched for brief mindfulness intervention RCTs assessing negative affectivity outcomes (e.g., depression, rumination, anxiety, stress). Sixty-five RCTs, including 5,489 participants predominantly without experience in meditation (64.64% female, mean age = 24.62), qualified for the meta-analytic review. Results: The meta-analysis revealed a small but significant effect of brief mindfulness training on reducing negative affectivity compared to control programs (g = .21, p .001). The overall effect size was significantly moderated by participant characteristics: community samples (g = .41, p .001) produced larger training effects compared to student samples (g = .14, p = .001; Q(between) p = .03). No significant effect size differences were found between clinical and nonclinical samples. However, when accounting for publication bias, the overall effect size of brief mindfulness training programs on negative affectivity was significantly reduced (g = .04). Conclusions: Brief mindfulness training programs are increasingly popular approaches for reducing negative affectivity. This meta-analysis indicates that brief mindfulness training modestly reduces negative affectivity. Quantitative analyses indicated the presence of publication bias (i.e., unpublished null effect studies), highlighting the need to continue rigorous evaluation of brief mindfulness interventions.
机译:目的:在过去的10年里,公布的随机对照试验(RCT)的简要介绍培训(从单一会议介入持续到2周的多次期限),有一些戏剧性的增加,有一些初步迹象表明这些培训计划可以改善心理健康结果,例如负面情感。该荟萃分析旨在评估简要介绍训练是否可靠地降低了负面影响。方法:有系统地搜索了PubMed,Psycinfo和思想富态研究月度通讯的简要介意干预RCT评估负面情感结果(例如,抑郁,谣言,焦虑,压力)。六十五个RCT,包括5,489名参与者,没有冥想经验(女性,平均年龄= 24.62),有资格获得Meta-Inalytic审查。结果:META分析表明,与控制程序相比减少负面情感的简要介绍训练(G = .21,P& .001)。参与者特征的整体效果大小显着调节:与学生样本相比,社区样本(G = .41,P& .001)产生了更大的训练效果(G = .14,p = .001; q(之间)p = .03)。在临床和非临床样品之间没有发现显着的效果大小差异。但是,当核算出版物偏见时,简要介绍负面情感培训计划的总体效果规模显着降低(G = .04)。结论:简要介绍培训计划越来越受降低负面情感的流行方法。该META分析表明,简要的侧重训练适度降低了负面影响。定量分析表明存在出版物偏差(即,未发表的空效应研究),突出了继续严格评估简要评估简要介意干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号