...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Epidemiology >Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 2: methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthesis
【24h】

Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 2: methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthesis

机译:Cochrane定性和实施方法组指导系列 - 纸张2:质疑制定,搜索和协议开发方法的定性证据综合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper updates previous Cochrane guidance on question formulation, searching, and protocol development, reflecting recent developments in methods for conducting qualitative evidence syntheses to inform Cochrane intervention reviews. Examples are used to illustrate how decisions about boundaries for a review are formed via an iterative process of constructing lines of inquiry and mapping the available information to ascertain whether evidence exists to answer questions related to effectiveness, implementation, feasibility, appropriateness, economic evidence, and equity. The process of question formulation allows reviewers to situate the topic in relation to how it informs and explains effectiveness, using the criterion of meaningfulness, appropriateness, feasibility, and implementation. Questions related to complex questions and interventions can be structured by drawing on an increasingly wide range of question frameworks. Logic models and theoretical frameworks are useful tools for conceptually mapping the literature to illustrate the complexity of the phenomenon of interest. Furthermore, protocol development may require iterative question formulation and searching. Consequently, the final protocol may function as a guide rather than a prescriptive route map, particularly in qualitative reviews that ask more exploratory and open-ended questions. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:本文更新了先前的Cochrane指南,根据问题制定,搜索和协议开发,反映了进行定性证据合成的方法的最新发展,以告知Cochrane干预审查。示例用于说明通过构建查询线和映射可用信息的迭代过程来形成关于审查的界限的决策如何确定有关有关有效性,实施,可行性,适当性,经济证据和经济证据的有关的问题。公平。问题制定的过程允许审核人员与其如何通知和解释有效性,利用有意义,适当性,可行性和实施的标准来满足主题。与复杂问题和干预相关的问题可以通过绘制越来越多的问题框架来构建。逻辑模型和理论框架是概念上映射文献的有用工具,以说明感兴趣的现象的复杂性。此外,协议开发可能需要迭代问题制定和搜索。因此,最终协议可以用作指导而不是规范的路线图,特别是在质量审查中,询问更多探索性和开放的问题。 (c)2017年Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号