首页> 外文期刊>AIDS >First-line antiretroviral therapy after single-dose nevirapine exposure in South Africa: a cost-effectiveness analysis of the OCTANE trial.
【24h】

First-line antiretroviral therapy after single-dose nevirapine exposure in South Africa: a cost-effectiveness analysis of the OCTANE trial.

机译:南非单剂量奈韦拉平暴露后的一线抗逆转录病毒疗法:OCTANE试验的成本效益分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The OCTANE trial reports superior outcomes of lopinavir/ritonavir vs. nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) among women previously exposed to single-dose nevirapine to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission. However, lopinavir/ritonavir is 12 times costlier than nevirapine. METHODS: We used a computer model, with OCTANE and local data, to simulate HIV-infected, single-dose nevirapine-exposed women in South Africa. Outcomes of three alternative ART sequences were projected: no ART (for comparison), first-line nevirapine, and first-line lopinavir/ritonavir. OCTANE data included mean age (31 years) and CD4 cell count (135/mul); median time since single-dose nevirapine (17 months); and 24-week viral suppression efficacy for first-line ART (nevirapine: 85%, lopinavir/ritonavir: 97%). Outcomes included life expectancy, per-person costs (2008 USDollars ), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS: With no ART, projected life expectancy was 1.6 years and per-person cost was Dollars 2980. First-line nevirapine increased life expectancy (15.2 years) and cost (Dollars 13 990; cost-effectiveness ratio: Dollars 810/year of life saved versus no ART). First-line lopinavir/ritonavir further increased life expectancy to 16.3 years and cost to Dollars 15 630 (cost-effectiveness ratio: Dollars 1520/year of life saved versus first-line nevirapine). First-line lopinavir/ritonavir cost-effectiveness was sensitive to prevalence of nevirapine-resistant virus at ART initiation, time from single-dose nevirapine exposure to ART initiation (6-12, 12-24, or >24 months), second-line ART efficacies, and outcomes after 24 weeks on ART. CONCLUSIONS: First-line lopinavir/ritonavir-based ART is very cost-effective in single-dose nevirapine-exposed, South African women similar to OCTANE participants. Lopinavir/ritonavir should be initiated in women with known nevirapine resistance or single-dose nevirapine exposure less than 12 months prior, or in whom such information is unknown.
机译:背景:OCTANE试验报告称,在以前接受过单剂量奈韦拉平预防母婴HIV传播的女性中,洛匹那韦/利托那韦相对于基于奈韦拉平的抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)效果更好。但是,洛匹那韦/利托那韦的价格是奈韦拉平的12倍。方法:我们使用具有OCTANE和本地数据的计算机模型来模拟南非感染HIV,单剂量尼维拉平暴露的妇女。预测了三种替代ART序列的结果:无ART(用于比较),一线奈韦拉平和一线洛匹那韦/利托那韦。 OCTANE数据包括平均年龄(31岁)和CD4细胞计数(135 / mul);自单剂量奈韦拉平以来的中位时间(17个月);一线抗病毒药物的24周病毒抑制效力(奈韦拉平:85%,洛匹那韦/利托那韦:97%)。结果包括预期寿命,人均费用(2008美元)和成本效益比的提高。结果:无抗逆转录病毒疗法,预期寿命为1.6年,人均费用为2980美元。一线奈韦拉平增加了预期寿命(15.2年)和费用(美元13 990;成本效益比:810美元/生命年)保存,而不保存ART)。一线洛匹那韦/利托那韦使预期寿命进一步延长至16.3年,成本为15630美元(成本效益比:与一线奈韦拉平相比,每生命年可节省1520美元)。一线洛匹那韦/利托那韦的成本效益对ART开始时,从单剂量奈韦拉平暴露至ART开始(6-12、12-24或> 24个月),第二线对奈韦拉平耐药病毒的流行率敏感抗逆转录病毒疗法的效果,以及抗逆转录病毒疗法24周后的转归。结论:基于洛匹那韦/利托那韦的一线抗逆转录病毒疗法在单剂量尼维拉平暴露的南非女性中很合算,与OCTANE参与者相似。对于已知奈韦拉平耐药或单剂量奈韦拉平暴露时间少于12个月或此类信息未知的女性,应开始使用洛匹那韦/利托那韦。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号